▲ 269 ▼ Parents outraged as Meta uses photos of schoolgirls in ads targeting man (www.theguardian.com) submitted 11 months ago by Duckxon@feddit.uk to c/news@lemmy.world 44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Kind of sounds like you're making excuses for Meta and for pedophiles at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 10 months ago (1 child) Who's the pedophile in this story? The person that posted the picture or the person that was shown it in an ad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) Neither. Your comment blamed parents but not Meta. It also talked about "men on the internet" as if they can be expected, as a normal man thing, to be into photos of kids. The concern is not men in general but pedophiles. And the responsibility is not just with parents but with Meta. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Sorry but this is just hilarious. Stupid parents mindlessly posted picture of their children on the internet and are not outraged that someone dared to look at them in a way they didn't expect. Is the picture sexual or not? If not, who cares how some guy looks at it. If yes, why would parents post them? I know, let's insert some imagined pedophiles into this story so we can justify our rage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago Stupid parents Idgaf how stupid their parents are, kids should be protected from being fucking pimped out to sell meta's brainwashing trash Is the picture sexual or not? Give me a break, if we know fucking anything about human sexuality its that different people get aroused by different shit, and sometimes they get aroused by shit they shouldn't, like children who cares how some guy looks at it It feels worth noting here that what actually happened is a single 37 year old dude took it upon himself to call a newspaper and say "yo, Facebook is shoving a bunch of schoolgirls pictures in my face, no boys, just girls, like I think they expect me to be into it, and that feels wrong." There was no creepy man in this story, the only creep here was the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 10 months ago (1 child) Who's the pedophile in this story? The person that posted the picture or the person that was shown it in an ad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) Neither. Your comment blamed parents but not Meta. It also talked about "men on the internet" as if they can be expected, as a normal man thing, to be into photos of kids. The concern is not men in general but pedophiles. And the responsibility is not just with parents but with Meta. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Sorry but this is just hilarious. Stupid parents mindlessly posted picture of their children on the internet and are not outraged that someone dared to look at them in a way they didn't expect. Is the picture sexual or not? If not, who cares how some guy looks at it. If yes, why would parents post them? I know, let's insert some imagined pedophiles into this story so we can justify our rage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago Stupid parents Idgaf how stupid their parents are, kids should be protected from being fucking pimped out to sell meta's brainwashing trash Is the picture sexual or not? Give me a break, if we know fucking anything about human sexuality its that different people get aroused by different shit, and sometimes they get aroused by shit they shouldn't, like children who cares how some guy looks at it It feels worth noting here that what actually happened is a single 37 year old dude took it upon himself to call a newspaper and say "yo, Facebook is shoving a bunch of schoolgirls pictures in my face, no boys, just girls, like I think they expect me to be into it, and that feels wrong." There was no creepy man in this story, the only creep here was the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) Neither. Your comment blamed parents but not Meta. It also talked about "men on the internet" as if they can be expected, as a normal man thing, to be into photos of kids. The concern is not men in general but pedophiles. And the responsibility is not just with parents but with Meta. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Sorry but this is just hilarious. Stupid parents mindlessly posted picture of their children on the internet and are not outraged that someone dared to look at them in a way they didn't expect. Is the picture sexual or not? If not, who cares how some guy looks at it. If yes, why would parents post them? I know, let's insert some imagined pedophiles into this story so we can justify our rage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago Stupid parents Idgaf how stupid their parents are, kids should be protected from being fucking pimped out to sell meta's brainwashing trash Is the picture sexual or not? Give me a break, if we know fucking anything about human sexuality its that different people get aroused by different shit, and sometimes they get aroused by shit they shouldn't, like children who cares how some guy looks at it It feels worth noting here that what actually happened is a single 37 year old dude took it upon himself to call a newspaper and say "yo, Facebook is shoving a bunch of schoolgirls pictures in my face, no boys, just girls, like I think they expect me to be into it, and that feels wrong." There was no creepy man in this story, the only creep here was the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Sorry but this is just hilarious. Stupid parents mindlessly posted picture of their children on the internet and are not outraged that someone dared to look at them in a way they didn't expect. Is the picture sexual or not? If not, who cares how some guy looks at it. If yes, why would parents post them? I know, let's insert some imagined pedophiles into this story so we can justify our rage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago Stupid parents Idgaf how stupid their parents are, kids should be protected from being fucking pimped out to sell meta's brainwashing trash Is the picture sexual or not? Give me a break, if we know fucking anything about human sexuality its that different people get aroused by different shit, and sometimes they get aroused by shit they shouldn't, like children who cares how some guy looks at it It feels worth noting here that what actually happened is a single 37 year old dude took it upon himself to call a newspaper and say "yo, Facebook is shoving a bunch of schoolgirls pictures in my face, no boys, just girls, like I think they expect me to be into it, and that feels wrong." There was no creepy man in this story, the only creep here was the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago Stupid parents Idgaf how stupid their parents are, kids should be protected from being fucking pimped out to sell meta's brainwashing trash Is the picture sexual or not? Give me a break, if we know fucking anything about human sexuality its that different people get aroused by different shit, and sometimes they get aroused by shit they shouldn't, like children who cares how some guy looks at it It feels worth noting here that what actually happened is a single 37 year old dude took it upon himself to call a newspaper and say "yo, Facebook is shoving a bunch of schoolgirls pictures in my face, no boys, just girls, like I think they expect me to be into it, and that feels wrong." There was no creepy man in this story, the only creep here was the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent