Just because we are arguing about the validity of a hypothetical scenario, does not mean you can introduce the fantastical to aid your argument. Socialism is achievable in the foreseeable future, post scarcity dream world where productivity doesn't matter does not.
Yes or no please.
Are you incapable of making a rebuttal without the use of a logical fallacy? Why would I agree to debate within the framework of a false dicotomy?
No sneaky sci-fi bullshit where it's the matrix or aliens or whatever, it's genuinely a society like that on a global scale.
You are dreaming of a post scarcity society when in reality we are entering an era that is going to be dictated by climate change, mass migration, and dwindling natural resources. Of course everyone would love to live in a post scarcity society..... but that's not a possibility in the foreseeable future outside of alien intervention nor some sci-fi scenario.