▲ 1001 ▼ what? (feddit.nl) submitted 3 years ago by slashasdf@feddit.nl to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago (3 children) But they're both programming languages... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Bye@lemmy.world 20 points 3 years ago (1 child) That’s the joke It’s implying js isn’t a programming language because web stuff isn’t real programming permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (3 children) Web stuff is like 99% of all programming across the world, but okay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Bye@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago Don’t get mad at me I’m just explaining it permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago Not even close. Most software out there is not consumer facing (there is a huge amount of custom stuff inside companies of all sizes) and even in the consumer space most software nowadays resides in ... smartphones. Unless, of course, you count HTML (literally a Markup Language, so data formatting for display not code) as programming, in which case I'll leave you to enjoy your fantasy world. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You kinda forget that for each front end you see theres at least 4 times more backend to support it. Also there are ton of non fron facing software. Anyway its not really a competition. No one will be offended if you are wrong or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago The back-end functionality is still web functionality. Just because a user doesn't see all the server stuff doesn't mean it's not necessary to support a website. There are billions of websites across the world, and they almost all use some combination of back-end, front-end, database, and server code. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShadedCosmos@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (3 children) I think they meant javascript is to web dev as python is to software dev permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 years ago it's a 4chan post, they don't "think" they are lawless animals, deprived from any sense of rationality permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zorque@kbin.social 8 points 3 years ago I think it's a 4chan post and thus intentionally dumb. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I read it as them both being loose-typed interpreted and widelly used languages. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago They do share a significant commonality, though; they are both interpreted languages, rather than compiled. Sure, you can compile them, but they are meant to be run interpreted so you can quickly and easily tweak and change things and not have to wait for compilation to see the results. In that regard they are very comparable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 20 points 3 years ago (1 child) That’s the joke It’s implying js isn’t a programming language because web stuff isn’t real programming permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (3 children) Web stuff is like 99% of all programming across the world, but okay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Bye@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago Don’t get mad at me I’m just explaining it permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago Not even close. Most software out there is not consumer facing (there is a huge amount of custom stuff inside companies of all sizes) and even in the consumer space most software nowadays resides in ... smartphones. Unless, of course, you count HTML (literally a Markup Language, so data formatting for display not code) as programming, in which case I'll leave you to enjoy your fantasy world. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You kinda forget that for each front end you see theres at least 4 times more backend to support it. Also there are ton of non fron facing software. Anyway its not really a competition. No one will be offended if you are wrong or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago The back-end functionality is still web functionality. Just because a user doesn't see all the server stuff doesn't mean it's not necessary to support a website. There are billions of websites across the world, and they almost all use some combination of back-end, front-end, database, and server code. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (3 children) Web stuff is like 99% of all programming across the world, but okay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Bye@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago Don’t get mad at me I’m just explaining it permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago Not even close. Most software out there is not consumer facing (there is a huge amount of custom stuff inside companies of all sizes) and even in the consumer space most software nowadays resides in ... smartphones. Unless, of course, you count HTML (literally a Markup Language, so data formatting for display not code) as programming, in which case I'll leave you to enjoy your fantasy world. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You kinda forget that for each front end you see theres at least 4 times more backend to support it. Also there are ton of non fron facing software. Anyway its not really a competition. No one will be offended if you are wrong or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago The back-end functionality is still web functionality. Just because a user doesn't see all the server stuff doesn't mean it's not necessary to support a website. There are billions of websites across the world, and they almost all use some combination of back-end, front-end, database, and server code. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago Don’t get mad at me I’m just explaining it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago Not even close. Most software out there is not consumer facing (there is a huge amount of custom stuff inside companies of all sizes) and even in the consumer space most software nowadays resides in ... smartphones. Unless, of course, you count HTML (literally a Markup Language, so data formatting for display not code) as programming, in which case I'll leave you to enjoy your fantasy world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You kinda forget that for each front end you see theres at least 4 times more backend to support it. Also there are ton of non fron facing software. Anyway its not really a competition. No one will be offended if you are wrong or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago The back-end functionality is still web functionality. Just because a user doesn't see all the server stuff doesn't mean it's not necessary to support a website. There are billions of websites across the world, and they almost all use some combination of back-end, front-end, database, and server code. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago The back-end functionality is still web functionality. Just because a user doesn't see all the server stuff doesn't mean it's not necessary to support a website. There are billions of websites across the world, and they almost all use some combination of back-end, front-end, database, and server code. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShadedCosmos@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (3 children) I think they meant javascript is to web dev as python is to software dev permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 years ago it's a 4chan post, they don't "think" they are lawless animals, deprived from any sense of rationality permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zorque@kbin.social 8 points 3 years ago I think it's a 4chan post and thus intentionally dumb. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I read it as them both being loose-typed interpreted and widelly used languages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 years ago it's a 4chan post, they don't "think" they are lawless animals, deprived from any sense of rationality permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 8 points 3 years ago I think it's a 4chan post and thus intentionally dumb. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I read it as them both being loose-typed interpreted and widelly used languages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago They do share a significant commonality, though; they are both interpreted languages, rather than compiled. Sure, you can compile them, but they are meant to be run interpreted so you can quickly and easily tweak and change things and not have to wait for compilation to see the results. In that regard they are very comparable. permalink fedilink source parent