▲ 324 ▼ Anon has a problem with Bioshock (sh.itjust.works) submitted 11 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 109 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) See: the zapatistas and revolutionary catalonia for examples of anarchist societies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) If you mean the zapatistas... duhhh? They were an anarchist movement within a country, they were attacked by the country they were founded in, and their enforcers were held in rotation and decided on by a fully public discussion that anyone in the community could attend, this is fully anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago They are absolutely on defence and i'm aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them you really didn't realize that the fact that they're still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago You should read about the Frontier days in America after the Louisiana Purchase. Might I suggest the testimony of Dee Harkey? Harkey continued, “Each person pretty much enforced the laws as he understood them. If the strong imposed his gun on the weak, or became ruthless in his dealings with his fellow man, there was always the posse.” Were the majority of the posses which lynched accused men justified in their actions? “Regardless of how men are tried, except by God alone, there are possibilities of mistakes. Those people who had to dish out punishment themselves instead of having someone dish it out for them, as is done today after sentence is pronounced, were usually pretty sure of the guilt before the punishment. Naturally, the formed posses were never considered a means to an end. They were just about as unpopular with the law as the lawless.” permalink fedilink source parent [+] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) See: the zapatistas and revolutionary catalonia for examples of anarchist societies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) If you mean the zapatistas... duhhh? They were an anarchist movement within a country, they were attacked by the country they were founded in, and their enforcers were held in rotation and decided on by a fully public discussion that anyone in the community could attend, this is fully anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago They are absolutely on defence and i'm aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them you really didn't realize that the fact that they're still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) If you mean the zapatistas... duhhh? They were an anarchist movement within a country, they were attacked by the country they were founded in, and their enforcers were held in rotation and decided on by a fully public discussion that anyone in the community could attend, this is fully anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago They are absolutely on defence and i'm aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them you really didn't realize that the fact that they're still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) If you mean the zapatistas... duhhh? They were an anarchist movement within a country, they were attacked by the country they were founded in, and their enforcers were held in rotation and decided on by a fully public discussion that anyone in the community could attend, this is fully anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago They are absolutely on defence and i'm aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them you really didn't realize that the fact that they're still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago They are absolutely on defence and i'm aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them you really didn't realize that the fact that they're still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 point 11 months ago They are absolutely on defence and i'm aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them you really didn't realize that the fact that they're still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago You should read about the Frontier days in America after the Louisiana Purchase. Might I suggest the testimony of Dee Harkey? Harkey continued, “Each person pretty much enforced the laws as he understood them. If the strong imposed his gun on the weak, or became ruthless in his dealings with his fellow man, there was always the posse.” Were the majority of the posses which lynched accused men justified in their actions? “Regardless of how men are tried, except by God alone, there are possibilities of mistakes. Those people who had to dish out punishment themselves instead of having someone dish it out for them, as is done today after sentence is pronounced, were usually pretty sure of the guilt before the punishment. Naturally, the formed posses were never considered a means to an end. They were just about as unpopular with the law as the lawless.” permalink fedilink source parent