you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

So why not have it be owned by some kind of non profit organization or handle it like local utilities?

I only mention it because a lot of what I've seen on the topic is people saying the point you made and nothing else. It just seems like we've (largely) figured out and implemented a way for the system to work in many places, but only for certain basic needs and not others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    That doesn't change anything useful. There are many not for profit health insurance companies in the us - they are no cheaper and don't have better service than the for profit ones.

  • source
  • parent