I can find plenty looking up even on Google so I am not sure if you really tried. Your last bit is pretty disingenuous, worse than his peers?

So already we can't judge him for being a slave holder (even though at the time slavery was already known as wrong) and doing things like extracting teeth out of slave's mouths to implant in his.

Other founding fathers are known to have engaged in acts of terrorism. Murder, rape, arson, and bombings were used against their fellow colonists. There was a masterful propaganda campaign where numerous lies were told to deceive colonists.

George Washington went on to lead these people and be a figurehead for the revolutionary war. Being a military commander he was of course responsible for numerous deaths. I find fault in this especially considering many of the battles before the revolution were involving land and other prospects/holdings Washington had. Having a profit motive definitely makes me doubt his actions.

While he was a general he was known for his lavish spending and corruption. So much so that when he became President Congress denied his request for an expense account. Someone even wrote a book about it. His $450k expense account after the war adjusted for inflation would be close to $20 million today. He was also more than half-way to being a billionaire with net worth of close to $600 million adjusted for inflation at his time of death.

The revolutionary war wasn't revolutionary at all. In fact, they ended up with a system eerily similar to the system they left. Wholesale copying the legal system amongst many other similarities. I think this is very damning when you compare modern day white washing and propaganda of their actions. They weren't fighting against corruption, they were the corruption.

They weren't doing it for the common good. They were wealthy individuals who wanted complete control. They created a country born out of violence and lies with a government system designed to embrace their corruption but prevent others from doing the same.

Their concern about corruption was just as much of a projection as we have now with compromised politicians calling it out. I suppose even a broken clock is right twice a day and certainly many of the things he and others said at the time weren't necessarily wrong. When you put it in perspective and critically analyze it though you begin to see the bullshit.