you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -21 points 11 months ago (6 children)

it runs a real copy of Windows

then just run windows; at that point if you're going to buy a license for windows, why go through hoops?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Because I use a paid graphics suite for profit (Affinity, great and pretty decent payment model), and I'm OK-ish with paying (a fair price) for stuff that allows me to make money, but I'd rather live in Linux for most everything else.

    I currently use Affinity mostly in a VM, and dual boot for some very specific things, but this seems to be a way to make the experience better.

    Also, a lot of people have paid for a license when buying their computer. I'm OK with people sidestepping the strict licensing terms if they have paid for it.

    It's not "you have pirated it", but "you aren't using it exactly as we want you to"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    it runs a real copy of Windows
    then just run windows

    umm, running windows in a container is still running windows so . . . . you would still just be running windows

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    and then it gets shutdown by the copyright police and you're out of luck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Microsoft offically supports and encourages using windows in a VM and container tho? It's massivly important for developers and server admins to be able to do. Even regardless of that, they'd still prefer you to run a windows vm and keep their OS as a core dependency of your computing life

  • source
  • parent