you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 11 months ago (9 children)

It’s easier that everyone in the family has the same surname imo

So the kids get double surnames?

Do their kids get quadruple surnames? Where does it end?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with the fact that it's easier for everyone to share the same name, especially when one parent travels alone with the kids. It's such a faff (with good reasons) if you don't have the same.

    The issue is more that it's often assumed that the wife has to take the husband's name by default, rather than it being ultimately a choice between the couple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The Spanish system is superior:
    FirstName(s) Parent1LastName Parent2LastName

    To clarify it's the first last name of both parents, and you can choose the order with the condition all children of same parents must have the same order.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Just pushes the issue down one generation…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Parent1 B C, Parent2 J K

    Makes Child1 C K

    (or Child1 K C)

    ...

    Parent3 B A, Parent4 J H

    Makes Child2 A H

    (or Child2 H A)

    ...

    Child1 and Child2 become Parent5 and Parent6

    Parent5 C K, Parent6 A H

    Child3 K H

    (or Child3 H K)

    ...

    it seems to work pretty well (ends up preferring people with two surnames, which is an ok amount of surnames)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    flamingo said, a couple comments up, that it's the first last name of both parents. So Child1 should be B J or J B, Child2 should be the same and Child3 should hence be B B, B J, J B, or J J depending on what 1 and 2 chose. Right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Icelandic patronyms like to have a word. You can have a 4 person family and nobody has the same "last name"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Which, like most Icelandic peculiarities, is adorable, but doesn’t scale well, especially with the pool of available names being restricted by the Naming Committee (in Iceland, it is illegal to give a child a name that is not on a list of approved names). With under 400,000 people in the country, and almost no family names, Icelandic phone directories apparently list people’s nicknames as well, so you don’t call the wrong Gunnlaugur Þóraresson by mistake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Nicknames are not listed, but profession is. However, I find claims of it "not scaling well" to be strange given there are three million "Smiths" in the US and most of which are entirely unrelated.

    Also, you can ask the committee to add new names, and they do let quite a few weird ones enter every month.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago*

    where I live, kids still usually take on their father’s name (sometimes the names are combined), but the mother almost never takes on her husband’s name. so yes, usually the mother will be an outlier in her family, last name wise.

    i don’t think mothers were i live are less connected to their family because of it, tho

    (altho, personally, i still don’t like the fact that it’s expected for kids to take on their father’s name, it feels like a relic of a shitty system better left in the past)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Couples I've known who both had double-barrelled surnames before marriage generally combined one of the names from each of their names to create a new double-barrelled name, which is what their new family and kids use. E.g. A-B marries X-Y and they become B-Y or X-A or whatever.

    Sometimes, the missing parts of the surname get given to specific children as middle names. Which is a nice way of acknowledging older family members without burdening your kid with an old or boring name.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I agree it's so much eeasier. It's kinda weird how much stuff gets easier when you just say "that's my wife/husband". It magically erodes a lot of barriers. People rarely check, but if they do they seem to only go as far as making sure the last names match.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    The legal use is 2 surnames, father mother, people can often recite combinations to several generations back, but that is really ancdotic, although it makes genealogy pretty straight forward

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Right... As long as people were faithful (90%)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Wellcome to the Spaniard custom, probably older than your country 🫠

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Eh weird dig considering a lot of other European countries do it that way. It's not just the US or Canada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    It's not really a dig on the age and the custom of the US, but a dig on the incredulity with which the system that has been in place for tons of generations in Spain was presented by the commenter. Let me rephrase it, "the custom is older than the US, don't talk about it as if it were an alien concept".

  • source
  • parent