789
The last few decades of politics (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by [M] to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Glad they're taking off the gloves a little, but it's always been a non-option to just make our lives significantly and irrevocably better like M4A or the PRO act and although they're good at trying and failing, they never talk about the consequences as dire as they actually are with few exceptions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to program them to do that.

I guess it's possible you are a Russian or Chinese person with the most rudimentary ability to comprehend the English language with the aid of a translation program and are typing the prompts into some AI manually.

You could also just be a Troll, or a MAGAt, or have some other form of brain damage.

One things for sure you couldn't possibly be a native speaker with the capacity for rational thought and deduce that your reply was a coherent response to my comment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    But WHY would a bot be programmed to do an edit?

    Also, promoting the DNC is the opposite of what Chinese, Russian, or Maga influences want. The Meuller Report revealed a very large amount of effort was put into promoting Bernie Sanders in 2016 AFTER THE PRIMARY ENDED. TikTok endorsed Trump in 2024 and in return Trump reversed the TikTok ban. Trump is siding with Russia over Ukraine, previously tried to dismantle NATO at the end of his last term, the same NATO that China hates with a passion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure who pays you or what the game is, but I'm not an idiot. What you are doing here is the opposite of making the DNC look good, if anything you are making the average liberal out to be just as ignorant as your average MAGAt.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I come here and argue with Tankies for fun. I mean, fuck yeah, imagine if you have a board full of magic buttons that pissed off Hitler? Press em all day long.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not a tankie, I don't even like tankies, but what does a tankie have to do with Hitler? You don't know what that word means either, do you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Lol sure okay you're not a Tankie you just oppose everyone that they oppose and support all the outcomes that they support. Maybe you're not a tankie, I'm sure there are no shortage of idiots.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    What do you think a tankie is? 😂🤣😂😅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Supporters of Authoritarian Eastern Empires including USSR, CCP, NK, and modern Russia. People who oppose liberalism, NATO, the EU, etc. They claim to oppose Capitalism but it's moreso just that they use it as a dog whistle to complain about the west without any real intention to bring any amount of fairness or progressive reform because they view the west and all of it's people as enemies who should suffer.

    The endorse and promote the GOP and under the strict condition that they don't actually have a chance at winning the election: any progressive candidate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Wow, that's actually not extremely far off from the mark! It's not right of course but it's the closest you have come so far to getting a correct answer this entire conversation.

    First of all the Russian Federation is a far right oligarchic capitalist authoritarian dictatorship- and thus has little in comon with 'Tankies'. It's much closer to a fascist nation than a "communist" one.

    Tankie is a pejorative term for authoritarian "communists", especially those who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes. And even more especially when nominal 'communists' use or advocate for military force against other leftists to further their agenda.

    Neither Leftists nor Tankies have anything whatsoever to do with Hitler or fascism- which is a far right ideology. Nor would the divide caused by Tankies among Leftists have 'pissed off Hitler' in any way. He would have been delighted by it in fact, since Fascism is an inherently anti-communist ideology and Stalin was one of his main enemies.

    So, instead of having "a board full of magic buttons that (would have) pissed off Hitler"- you are just a very ill informed troll that would have pleased Hitler more than anyone.

    The USSR, the PRC, and the DPRK are/were Tankies, so you got that much right at least. However extending the definition of Tankie to include anyone that couldn't defeat the GOP in an election is moronic in the extreme. Actually saying that is a moronic take is an insult to morons.

    On top of that, much like in many other areas you haven't the slightest clue as to whether or not Bernie could have beaten Trump if the DNC hadn't colluded against him- in fact many political analysts predicted that Bernie would have handily defeated Trump in 2016- and support for progressive and leftist thought has grown exponentially since then. As a matter of fact it's probable that the DNC propping up a right wing Harris during the last election instead of a progressive was what cost us the election and put Trump in power- so the DNC would count as Tankies by your own very stupid definition.

    Considering your inability to differentiate between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, your analysis on who or what could potentially beat the GOP in an election means even less than nothing. Tucker Carlson has a better grasp of the political landscape than you do, and believe me that is a super low bar to clear.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent