you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

In this hypothetical scenario this gets implemented it would certainly be standard to have a clause to protect employers against exactly that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Seems kinda shitty that you basically can't move without employer's approval.

    Also poorer people living farther away would get discriminated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    It’d be fair to just keep paying the same compensation you received before moving; you could still move, but you’d have to pay the price.

    And yeah, there are still a lot of problems with this approach as long as housing is left to market forces. But those problems are inherent to free markets, not to this possible solution to another problem.

  • source
  • parent