▲ 159 ▼ Microsoft's latest Windows 11 24H2 update breaks SSDs/HDDs, may corrupt data (www.neowin.net) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@piefed.world to c/technology@lemmy.zip 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) free and open source operating system that never has issues like this ever use BTRFS? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I've only recently been made aware of btrfs' tendency to completely fuck data at failure states. I've been using that filesystem on fedora for maybe two years now without issue, though I suppose I don't regularly find myself hitting the issues required to cause these problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago Well yeah, like the article I linked says: It has now been nearly eight years since the "experimental" tag was removed, but many of btrfs' age-old problems remain unaddressed and effectively unchanged. So, we'll repeat this once more: as a single-disk filesystem, btrfs has been stable and for the most part performant for years. But the deeper you get into the new features btrfs offers, the shakier the ground you walk on—that's what we're focusing on today. So if you're just using it for your PC hard drive you're probably fine. The problem is that BTRFS is intended to provide similar features to RAID and ZFS, but that's where it starts failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I've only recently been made aware of btrfs' tendency to completely fuck data at failure states. I've been using that filesystem on fedora for maybe two years now without issue, though I suppose I don't regularly find myself hitting the issues required to cause these problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago Well yeah, like the article I linked says: It has now been nearly eight years since the "experimental" tag was removed, but many of btrfs' age-old problems remain unaddressed and effectively unchanged. So, we'll repeat this once more: as a single-disk filesystem, btrfs has been stable and for the most part performant for years. But the deeper you get into the new features btrfs offers, the shakier the ground you walk on—that's what we're focusing on today. So if you're just using it for your PC hard drive you're probably fine. The problem is that BTRFS is intended to provide similar features to RAID and ZFS, but that's where it starts failing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago Well yeah, like the article I linked says: It has now been nearly eight years since the "experimental" tag was removed, but many of btrfs' age-old problems remain unaddressed and effectively unchanged. So, we'll repeat this once more: as a single-disk filesystem, btrfs has been stable and for the most part performant for years. But the deeper you get into the new features btrfs offers, the shakier the ground you walk on—that's what we're focusing on today. So if you're just using it for your PC hard drive you're probably fine. The problem is that BTRFS is intended to provide similar features to RAID and ZFS, but that's where it starts failing. permalink fedilink source parent