▲ 804 ▼ "Thin strip of land" (gregtech.eu) submitted 11 months ago by lena@gregtech.eu to c/memes@lemmy.world 59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago* (3 children) It is a very thick but even taller strip of land. The point of reference for it's thinness shouldn't be it's own height, but rather the sizes of countries in general. I mean, it's still be thin, but the UK has no place throwing stones from within that glass house lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Noturbuddy@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 months ago It just looks skinny because of how long it is baby I promise it's more than thicc enough for you 😏 permalink fedilink source parent [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 11 months ago (2 children) I feel like this is stretching the definition of "thin" to make sure nobody feels insecure about the proportions of the land claimed by local government. What are we doing here, folks? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago Geoshaming permalink fedilink source parent [–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* Yao Ming isn't thin. He's wider than almost anyone you know. It'd be crazy to call him thin. But he is still lanky, because of his proportions. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) It's not very thick, it is thin, but it's extremely long. Chile that is. Not many countries outside of Europe are as small east-to-west as Chile. Even in Europe the major countries like France, Germany, Spain and even the UK are bigger east-to-west. Italy is bigger east-to-west, but mostly because it's angled. If it were oriented vertically like Chile it would be thinner along most of the boot, but still wider than Chile along the top from the coast near Nice to Venice. Also worth noting that although the UK isn't all that wide, it has major port cities on both east and west coasts. Chile has an inhospitable mountain range on its eastern side, so really the population is concentrated in an area that's much thinner than the geographic boundaries of the country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago I recognize that I didn't present a very coherent comment, but that's basically what I meant with my last sentence, lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] wrinkletip@feddit.nl 1 point 11 months ago Looks at Norway, 8.3km at the narrowest permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Noturbuddy@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 months ago It just looks skinny because of how long it is baby I promise it's more than thicc enough for you 😏 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 11 months ago (2 children) I feel like this is stretching the definition of "thin" to make sure nobody feels insecure about the proportions of the land claimed by local government. What are we doing here, folks? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago Geoshaming permalink fedilink source parent [–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* Yao Ming isn't thin. He's wider than almost anyone you know. It'd be crazy to call him thin. But he is still lanky, because of his proportions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago Geoshaming permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* Yao Ming isn't thin. He's wider than almost anyone you know. It'd be crazy to call him thin. But he is still lanky, because of his proportions. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) It's not very thick, it is thin, but it's extremely long. Chile that is. Not many countries outside of Europe are as small east-to-west as Chile. Even in Europe the major countries like France, Germany, Spain and even the UK are bigger east-to-west. Italy is bigger east-to-west, but mostly because it's angled. If it were oriented vertically like Chile it would be thinner along most of the boot, but still wider than Chile along the top from the coast near Nice to Venice. Also worth noting that although the UK isn't all that wide, it has major port cities on both east and west coasts. Chile has an inhospitable mountain range on its eastern side, so really the population is concentrated in an area that's much thinner than the geographic boundaries of the country. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago I recognize that I didn't present a very coherent comment, but that's basically what I meant with my last sentence, lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] wrinkletip@feddit.nl 1 point 11 months ago Looks at Norway, 8.3km at the narrowest permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago I recognize that I didn't present a very coherent comment, but that's basically what I meant with my last sentence, lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wrinkletip@feddit.nl 1 point 11 months ago Looks at Norway, 8.3km at the narrowest permalink fedilink source parent