Why didn't it succeed?

Concorde flights came to a screeching halt after only 27 years of operation on October 24, 2003. The reason? Excessive cost, high fares, and loud noise. On a regular flight, Concordes consumed 6,771 gallons of fuel, which quickly exceeded the profit made from the flight. In addition to that, only a total of 20 Concordes were built and no airline ordered them except for Air France and British Airways, who had to as they were state-run airlines at the time.

Oh, and a 2000 crash that killed everyone on board (109 people) and four people on the ground.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 265 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Aw the Concord is a TIL now. They were really cool looking.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I loved how they looked down like a bird while landing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, until they flew over your house. If you think living near an airport is bad these days…. Concorde begs to differ

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I never understood why they could not just go slow until they got up to cruising altitude and then gun it, wouldn't that solve the sound problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Weren't they basically horribly inefficient at slower speeds? That's how I understand most supersonic craft to be. In order to maximize their efficiency at their intended cruising speed, they sacrifice efficiency at slower speeds. Spend too much time at those lower speeds you end up not having enough fuel to get to your destination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    That may be true, but don't forget about the aerodynamics. They have smaller, swept wings to lower any drag and to provide the proper lift at cruising speed.

    At slow speeds they likely have the ailerons cranked near maxlift, just to stay aloft. (This likely causes or at least contributes to the fuel inefficiency, due to the increased drag.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's the whole "I'll fall out of the sky if I go any slower with this delta wing" thing.

    To create enough lift on a smaller wing you'll have to go fast. A delta wing (v shape at the back) like on the Concord and almost all fighterjets makes it easier to go fast. They just suck at going slow.

    Add to that the " go faster!" Engines and you'll get a very loud plane.

    A Concorde was for all intents and purposes just a very large fighterjet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sonic booms are a constant noise, so they would always be making a noise at max speed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Museum of flight has one you can go it (not just a TIL, but also in a museum!). It is pretty cool and worth checking out if you are in the area.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments