you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The way I've heard it described: If I check out a home repair book and use that knowledge to do some handy-man work on the side, do I owe the publisher a cut of my profits?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    If, without asking for permission, 1 person used my work to learn from it and taught themself to replicate it I'd be honoured. If somebody is teaching a class full of people that, I'd have objections. So when a company is training a machine to do that very same thing, and will be able to do that thousands of time per second, again, without asking for permission first, I'd be pissed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's a terrible analogy.

    Reading a book designed to instruct you how to do tasks is not the same thing as training generative AI with novels, say, to write a novel for you.

    The user of the AI benefits from the work and talent of the authors with little effort of their own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So how about someone who loves to read books wants to become a writer, and uses the plot twists, characters, environments, writing style of books they already read.

    Does that fall under copyright?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments