▲ 1210 ▼ POVERTY IS A FEATURE NOT A BUG (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 345 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] snaf@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) So it sounds like zoning laws are the problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) In some cases. But even proposed changes to zoning laws can get this kind of opposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Aside from zoning laws, there's the lack of a unified federal intervention. This prevents any one area from addressing the local homeless issue because any area that takes steps to address it will consequently absorb more homeless individuals from other places in the country. For example, if a city in California develops a program to house any homeless individuals, then homeless individuals from other cities and states will be more likely to go to said city to get housed. Even worse, there are states that would actually pay for their transportation. What would happen is that either the city would have to solve a much larger homeless problem as new homeless move into town, or the initial wave of homeless people will be house while the new arrivals and homeless will stay homeless, leaving a continued homeless problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Succinctly put. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So conservative NIMBYs are the problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago There's definitely an "I got mine, fuck you." component, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) In some cases. But even proposed changes to zoning laws can get this kind of opposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Aside from zoning laws, there's the lack of a unified federal intervention. This prevents any one area from addressing the local homeless issue because any area that takes steps to address it will consequently absorb more homeless individuals from other places in the country. For example, if a city in California develops a program to house any homeless individuals, then homeless individuals from other cities and states will be more likely to go to said city to get housed. Even worse, there are states that would actually pay for their transportation. What would happen is that either the city would have to solve a much larger homeless problem as new homeless move into town, or the initial wave of homeless people will be house while the new arrivals and homeless will stay homeless, leaving a continued homeless problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Succinctly put. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So conservative NIMBYs are the problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago There's definitely an "I got mine, fuck you." component, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Aside from zoning laws, there's the lack of a unified federal intervention. This prevents any one area from addressing the local homeless issue because any area that takes steps to address it will consequently absorb more homeless individuals from other places in the country. For example, if a city in California develops a program to house any homeless individuals, then homeless individuals from other cities and states will be more likely to go to said city to get housed. Even worse, there are states that would actually pay for their transportation. What would happen is that either the city would have to solve a much larger homeless problem as new homeless move into town, or the initial wave of homeless people will be house while the new arrivals and homeless will stay homeless, leaving a continued homeless problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Succinctly put. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Succinctly put. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So conservative NIMBYs are the problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago There's definitely an "I got mine, fuck you." component, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago There's definitely an "I got mine, fuck you." component, yes. permalink fedilink source parent