you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 194 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I have a lot of questions about different parts of this title that I don't understand, but I support him.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 123 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Marc Tyler Nobleman was supposed to talk to kids about the secret co-creator of Batman, with the aim of inspiring young students in suburban Atlanta’s Forsyth County to research and write.

    Then the school district told him he had to cut a key point from his presentation — that the artist he helped rescue from obscurity had a gay son. Rather than acquiesce, he canceled the last of his talks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    First of all thank you for saving a click. Secondly, Marc Tyler Nobleman is not just a Batman researcher, he is a symbol. What an absolute Chad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Would he have said the artist had a 'straight' son? Or is it just a son in that case?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think you know what that means.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You misunderstand.

    I'm highlighting how the son's sexual orientation would likely not be brought up if he was straight, unless it was relevant to the story at hand.

    Mentioning someone is gay just because they're gay is focusing on their sexual orientation for no good reason, just pointing out that they're 'different' and need to be acknowledge as such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments