you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

So that second one is interesting, because it brings up the whole pants things. Pants appears plural, but you don't wear a pant. Seems to be a similar situation for tights here. A pair of pants. Hmmm. Got a do some research here about the history of pants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Two legs though. I think it’s pretty natural to say “pant leg”, but off sounding to say “pants leg” but you could say “pants legs” So maybe pant, or Tight would just be one leg?

  • source
  • parent