▲ 95 ▼ Is This Even Legal? (midwest.social) submitted 3 years ago by Fish@midwest.social to c/assholedesign@lemmy.world 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments The amount going to Humble is the most, even the the Humble slider is the lowest.
[+] Draces@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rikudou@lemmings.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's all about the intent. Steam is there to sell you games. Humble is there to support charities while giving you cheap stuff. In their description the charities are the first thing that gets mentioned. And then they give them 5% of the money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Draces@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you want them to do? What I'd want? For them to give at least half, not measly 5%. Come on, they're bragging about giving to charity while really not giving them 95% of their income. Like, at this point I'd rather donate the $12 to the charity myself than support yet another parasite on the donation system. I donate to various things regularly (mostly stuff local for my country, but some international as well from time to time), be it charity or open source projects, and I hate when everyone takes a cut out of this. But at least most of them have the decency to send most of the money further, not only 5%. I'm negative because I don't see anything positive on a charity gaining $0.60 when $12 was given to the one who collects the money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Draces@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's all about the intent. Steam is there to sell you games. Humble is there to support charities while giving you cheap stuff. In their description the charities are the first thing that gets mentioned. And then they give them 5% of the money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Draces@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you want them to do? What I'd want? For them to give at least half, not measly 5%. Come on, they're bragging about giving to charity while really not giving them 95% of their income. Like, at this point I'd rather donate the $12 to the charity myself than support yet another parasite on the donation system. I donate to various things regularly (mostly stuff local for my country, but some international as well from time to time), be it charity or open source projects, and I hate when everyone takes a cut out of this. But at least most of them have the decency to send most of the money further, not only 5%. I'm negative because I don't see anything positive on a charity gaining $0.60 when $12 was given to the one who collects the money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Draces@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Draces@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you want them to do? What I'd want? For them to give at least half, not measly 5%. Come on, they're bragging about giving to charity while really not giving them 95% of their income. Like, at this point I'd rather donate the $12 to the charity myself than support yet another parasite on the donation system. I donate to various things regularly (mostly stuff local for my country, but some international as well from time to time), be it charity or open source projects, and I hate when everyone takes a cut out of this. But at least most of them have the decency to send most of the money further, not only 5%. I'm negative because I don't see anything positive on a charity gaining $0.60 when $12 was given to the one who collects the money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Draces@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What do you want them to do? What I'd want? For them to give at least half, not measly 5%. Come on, they're bragging about giving to charity while really not giving them 95% of their income. Like, at this point I'd rather donate the $12 to the charity myself than support yet another parasite on the donation system. I donate to various things regularly (mostly stuff local for my country, but some international as well from time to time), be it charity or open source projects, and I hate when everyone takes a cut out of this. But at least most of them have the decency to send most of the money further, not only 5%. I'm negative because I don't see anything positive on a charity gaining $0.60 when $12 was given to the one who collects the money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Draces@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Draces@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent