▲ 813 ▼ Barack Obama Is Also Scared Shitless That Donald Trump Could Win Another Term: Report (www.vanityfair.com) submitted 3 years ago by eurekaphoenix@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 371 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yes, but by the same token, you can't honestly say that America chose him to be president. We did not. Our broken electoral system did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Right except that the electoral system was not designed with that in mind. We have the transcripts of the discussion. It was to keep slavery legal. The method the POTUS was picked originally was to prevent the common person from deciding and instead award the most powerful job to whom the most powerful elites thought best could do it. Which wow even being nice to the argument is pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Sure. You can cheat and just look up the history of the electoral college or you can dive into the notes of the second constitutional convention. permalink fedilink source parent [–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago the thing about tyranny of the majority is that it can't be replaced by tyranny of the minority. it's absolutely working as our founders intended though: racist, conservative, and biased in favor of the wealthy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) The intent was to keep a populist tyrant like Trump out of office, so it most certainly is not working as intended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago No, just figuratively. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Right except that the electoral system was not designed with that in mind. We have the transcripts of the discussion. It was to keep slavery legal. The method the POTUS was picked originally was to prevent the common person from deciding and instead award the most powerful job to whom the most powerful elites thought best could do it. Which wow even being nice to the argument is pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Sure. You can cheat and just look up the history of the electoral college or you can dive into the notes of the second constitutional convention. permalink fedilink source parent [–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago the thing about tyranny of the majority is that it can't be replaced by tyranny of the minority. it's absolutely working as our founders intended though: racist, conservative, and biased in favor of the wealthy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) The intent was to keep a populist tyrant like Trump out of office, so it most certainly is not working as intended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago No, just figuratively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Right except that the electoral system was not designed with that in mind. We have the transcripts of the discussion. It was to keep slavery legal. The method the POTUS was picked originally was to prevent the common person from deciding and instead award the most powerful job to whom the most powerful elites thought best could do it. Which wow even being nice to the argument is pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Sure. You can cheat and just look up the history of the electoral college or you can dive into the notes of the second constitutional convention. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Sure. You can cheat and just look up the history of the electoral college or you can dive into the notes of the second constitutional convention. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Sure. You can cheat and just look up the history of the electoral college or you can dive into the notes of the second constitutional convention. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago the thing about tyranny of the majority is that it can't be replaced by tyranny of the minority. it's absolutely working as our founders intended though: racist, conservative, and biased in favor of the wealthy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) The intent was to keep a populist tyrant like Trump out of office, so it most certainly is not working as intended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago No, just figuratively. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SneedsFeednSeed@lemmy.world -8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago No, just figuratively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago No, just figuratively. permalink fedilink source parent