you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Their future e-waste is now part of the view, just gotta accept it and hope the billboards up there aren't developed in our lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not much remains of them upon reentry. At least nothing that can be called e-waste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    they just aerosolize creating even faster global warming

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wouldn't high-altitude metallic aerosols do the opposite?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    unfortunately no. per my understanding the problem with starlink satellites burning up on re-entry are two fold:

    1. the aerosolized aluminum retains heat, not reflects it
    2. the aerosolized aluminum reacts with ozone, damaging a critical protective layer against the greenhouse effect
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments