Seriosly, why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There probably just isn't the kind of direct evidence people imagine. You can't prosecute people just for associating with a creep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I specifically mentioned Les Wexner for a reason. While the public information includes an absolute ton of red flags, and it's very likely that he bought child prostitutes, it doesn't reach the level proof beyond a reasonable doubt. IOW, it's unlikely to reach a conviction in court.

    These people are also rich enough to drag out a court case for decades, even longer than the government. As such, they aren't likely to take a plea agreement that's more than a slap on the wrist and without admitting anything serious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Okay, fine. Then if there was never going to be a prosecution, then there was no impediment to the Biden admin releasing the files.

    So, which is it: did the Biden administration fuck up by slow-walking the prosecution, or did the Biden administration fuck up by failing to release the files even when it had no intention of prosecuting? Those are the only options!

  • source
  • parent