If any of you lovely shitposters have the same for instagram and tik tok my homies in discord¹ will be very pleased

¹ Yes I try to bring them into Matrix or Lemmy but it is not that easy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

.ml, hexbear and grad up left

Rest down left

Gonna be the most boring one :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    blahaj up left

    I have the feeling that db0 is down right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Blahaj is explicitly anti-tankie. I mean look at the banner of !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone, so they are clearly lib left.

    Whilst dbzer0 is literally explicitly anti-capitalist.

    So both of those go lib left. Perhaps dbzer0 more lib and blahaj more left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn't mean they're not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.

    !196@lemmy.world doesn't exist for no reason

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Youre mixing up moderation style and political ideology.

    Blahaj is moderated to be a safe space for trans people. That means they remove anything remotely insulting or harmful. That’s their moderation policy. That doesn’t mean their political views are authoritarian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    both are often linked

    Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Do you not understand the concept of a safe space?

    When you’re literally one of the most politically targeted groups and create a community the point might not be to make it a “free speech zone” but the one place on the internet you feel safe.

    That doesn’t make them authoritarian politically. They’re just admins following through on a vision. Where people can freely join their instance or not. Not politicians enforcing their views on people who didn’t consent to it.

    Blahaj doesn’t pretend to be a neutral instance like lemmy.ml does. It’s explicit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Correct. We currently have some sentiment against liberal spaces and DEI programs and so on. And some people think it's the war against straight white men. But having a men's groups or women's groups or safe-spaces to talk freely about whatever topics isn't authoritarian. The opposite of it is equally true. You can't discuss certain topics without the correct space for it, and not allowing them to discuss how they like is authoritatian as well!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.

    When you ban people disagreeing with you, you're not making anyone feel safer, you're just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard

    When you ban people by stating they're transphobic when they're not, you're being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you're with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.

    When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.

    But maybe it's just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hey, we are an anarchist instance, not "anarcho"capitalist. (Look at db0's blog, he might be an ai shill but he's not an ancap)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    So you’re at the bottom 🤔, but where on the horizontal axis is to be guessed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We're on the left. The only anarchism is social anarchism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean... can you really call it anarchism if you have a n implicit hierarchy? I would say that defeats the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Income inequalities don't implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

    Anarchism mainly rejects the state's hierarchy. It doesn't make it left or right

    Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Anarchism in it's correct interpretation rejects all hierarchies, be it from the state, white supremacy, the patriarchy or capitalism. Since money is equivalent to power income inequality does inherently imply a hierarchy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The wikipedia definition doesn't seem to agree with what you're saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's not really a valid argument, as wikipedia is descriptive, not prescriptive. But besides that, yes it does?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I still fail to see how anarchism inherently wants to make salaries and income more even

    That’s an extension that belongs to a branch of anarchism, it is not supposed to be like this by definition

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Anarchism wants to do away with salaries altogether in most cases. Anarchism is about increasing freedom, meaning the ability for an individual to take the actions they want to take. A part of this is ensuring no person is dying of starvation/living on the street/etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Politically illiterate comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    for db0 it might be as frankly I don't know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they're more open towards liberalism

    But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot

    Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left

    Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you're banned. So authoritarian

  • source
  • parent