▲ 585 ▼ Solar + Battery (covering 97% of demand) is now cheaper than coal and nuclear (ember-energy.org) submitted 1 year ago by gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world 101 comments fedilink hide all child comments Some key insights from the article: Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.