you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

It is definitely not constitutional protected free speech. Because constitution has nothing to say in this matter. On the other hand there is no law restricting such speech either. Making a law against it, that is valid under the constitution, would be tricky however.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Making a law against it, that is valid under the constitution...

    The part that says...

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assem- ble, and to petition the Government for a re- dress of grievances.

    Make a law against the part that says not to make a law against it?

    I mean, it's idiotic and on message for Trump.

  • source
  • parent