▲ 29 ▼ Large Language Model Performance Doubles Every 7 Months (spectrum.ieee.org) submitted 1 year ago by flango@lemmy.eco.br to c/technology@lemmy.world 54 comments fedilink hide all child comments By 2030, AI will greatly outperform humans in some complex intellectual tasks. Discover how LLMs are doubling their capabilities every seven months.
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br [S] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child) I doubt it permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ddplf@szmer.info 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) Then why share it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you not see any value in engaging with views you don't personally agree with? I don't think agreeing with it is a good barometer for whether it's post-worthy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ddplf@szmer.info 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Good point, thank you, I figured that sharing poor scientific articles essentially equals spreading misinformation (which I think is a fair point either), but I like your perspective either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago I guess the value is that at some point you'll probably hear the core claim - "AI is improving exponentially" - regurgitated by someone making a bad argument, and knowing the original source and context can be very helpful to countering that disinformation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago So we can mock it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) Then why share it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you not see any value in engaging with views you don't personally agree with? I don't think agreeing with it is a good barometer for whether it's post-worthy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ddplf@szmer.info 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Good point, thank you, I figured that sharing poor scientific articles essentially equals spreading misinformation (which I think is a fair point either), but I like your perspective either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago I guess the value is that at some point you'll probably hear the core claim - "AI is improving exponentially" - regurgitated by someone making a bad argument, and knowing the original source and context can be very helpful to countering that disinformation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago So we can mock it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you not see any value in engaging with views you don't personally agree with? I don't think agreeing with it is a good barometer for whether it's post-worthy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ddplf@szmer.info 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Good point, thank you, I figured that sharing poor scientific articles essentially equals spreading misinformation (which I think is a fair point either), but I like your perspective either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago I guess the value is that at some point you'll probably hear the core claim - "AI is improving exponentially" - regurgitated by someone making a bad argument, and knowing the original source and context can be very helpful to countering that disinformation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Good point, thank you, I figured that sharing poor scientific articles essentially equals spreading misinformation (which I think is a fair point either), but I like your perspective either permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago I guess the value is that at some point you'll probably hear the core claim - "AI is improving exponentially" - regurgitated by someone making a bad argument, and knowing the original source and context can be very helpful to countering that disinformation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago I guess the value is that at some point you'll probably hear the core claim - "AI is improving exponentially" - regurgitated by someone making a bad argument, and knowing the original source and context can be very helpful to countering that disinformation. permalink fedilink source parent