Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

i’m sure you can squeeze out a measly 3% from wind and hydro, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments