▲ 749 ▼ Soon (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (2 children) “Average” permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children) Mean, median, or mode? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I take preference to the “Russian method” cut off the high and low score and mean them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) it isn't an average, it's a literal bs made up number permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure, but that doesn’t change there will be outliers at both ends. And the lower end would likely have far more. So no matter the average, it would be on lower end of the max. So if an empire and only one lasted to 1000, but others 5 years, or even days. It makes sense that an average around 250 is entirely possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) if you want to go into statistics, normal average are useless for these things, as many empires last a few years, while others can last thousands. they don't fall in a normal distribution, you might need a geometric mean. but also, empire is such a vague term. did the Roman empire fall around the 5 century? or do you count Byzantium as the Roman empire? Did England start with the Norman invasion? or was it from before and the Normans were just a new dynasty? it's something that's practically impossible to count, what's an empire? when it started/ended? and on top of that no normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don’t disagree, there isn’t a great way to quantify the data, I’m just making a discussion out of the main comment seemingly missing what an average is by talking about edge cases on the high end. Also their 3 examples, which I assume are the only 3 high end cases. Already have a massive discrepancy. 1000 and the next closest being ~600, it infers that long empires are few and far between. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) there's no average, that number was literally made up for some bs theory of empires. it isn't because it's an "average" it's literally made it, and it's impossible to get, as whatever definition of empire will miss so many "empires". it's multiple layers of bs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children) Mean, median, or mode? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I take preference to the “Russian method” cut off the high and low score and mean them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I take preference to the “Russian method” cut off the high and low score and mean them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) it isn't an average, it's a literal bs made up number permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure, but that doesn’t change there will be outliers at both ends. And the lower end would likely have far more. So no matter the average, it would be on lower end of the max. So if an empire and only one lasted to 1000, but others 5 years, or even days. It makes sense that an average around 250 is entirely possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) if you want to go into statistics, normal average are useless for these things, as many empires last a few years, while others can last thousands. they don't fall in a normal distribution, you might need a geometric mean. but also, empire is such a vague term. did the Roman empire fall around the 5 century? or do you count Byzantium as the Roman empire? Did England start with the Norman invasion? or was it from before and the Normans were just a new dynasty? it's something that's practically impossible to count, what's an empire? when it started/ended? and on top of that no normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don’t disagree, there isn’t a great way to quantify the data, I’m just making a discussion out of the main comment seemingly missing what an average is by talking about edge cases on the high end. Also their 3 examples, which I assume are the only 3 high end cases. Already have a massive discrepancy. 1000 and the next closest being ~600, it infers that long empires are few and far between. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) there's no average, that number was literally made up for some bs theory of empires. it isn't because it's an "average" it's literally made it, and it's impossible to get, as whatever definition of empire will miss so many "empires". it's multiple layers of bs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure, but that doesn’t change there will be outliers at both ends. And the lower end would likely have far more. So no matter the average, it would be on lower end of the max. So if an empire and only one lasted to 1000, but others 5 years, or even days. It makes sense that an average around 250 is entirely possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) if you want to go into statistics, normal average are useless for these things, as many empires last a few years, while others can last thousands. they don't fall in a normal distribution, you might need a geometric mean. but also, empire is such a vague term. did the Roman empire fall around the 5 century? or do you count Byzantium as the Roman empire? Did England start with the Norman invasion? or was it from before and the Normans were just a new dynasty? it's something that's practically impossible to count, what's an empire? when it started/ended? and on top of that no normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don’t disagree, there isn’t a great way to quantify the data, I’m just making a discussion out of the main comment seemingly missing what an average is by talking about edge cases on the high end. Also their 3 examples, which I assume are the only 3 high end cases. Already have a massive discrepancy. 1000 and the next closest being ~600, it infers that long empires are few and far between. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) there's no average, that number was literally made up for some bs theory of empires. it isn't because it's an "average" it's literally made it, and it's impossible to get, as whatever definition of empire will miss so many "empires". it's multiple layers of bs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) if you want to go into statistics, normal average are useless for these things, as many empires last a few years, while others can last thousands. they don't fall in a normal distribution, you might need a geometric mean. but also, empire is such a vague term. did the Roman empire fall around the 5 century? or do you count Byzantium as the Roman empire? Did England start with the Norman invasion? or was it from before and the Normans were just a new dynasty? it's something that's practically impossible to count, what's an empire? when it started/ended? and on top of that no normal distribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don’t disagree, there isn’t a great way to quantify the data, I’m just making a discussion out of the main comment seemingly missing what an average is by talking about edge cases on the high end. Also their 3 examples, which I assume are the only 3 high end cases. Already have a massive discrepancy. 1000 and the next closest being ~600, it infers that long empires are few and far between. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) there's no average, that number was literally made up for some bs theory of empires. it isn't because it's an "average" it's literally made it, and it's impossible to get, as whatever definition of empire will miss so many "empires". it's multiple layers of bs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don’t disagree, there isn’t a great way to quantify the data, I’m just making a discussion out of the main comment seemingly missing what an average is by talking about edge cases on the high end. Also their 3 examples, which I assume are the only 3 high end cases. Already have a massive discrepancy. 1000 and the next closest being ~600, it infers that long empires are few and far between. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) there's no average, that number was literally made up for some bs theory of empires. it isn't because it's an "average" it's literally made it, and it's impossible to get, as whatever definition of empire will miss so many "empires". it's multiple layers of bs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) there's no average, that number was literally made up for some bs theory of empires. it isn't because it's an "average" it's literally made it, and it's impossible to get, as whatever definition of empire will miss so many "empires". it's multiple layers of bs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago No one’s arguing that dude, but that doesn’t mean people can’t point out and talk about someone who missed what an average is as well. permalink fedilink source parent
