▲ 585 ▼ Solar + Battery (covering 97% of demand) is now cheaper than coal and nuclear (ember-energy.org) submitted 1 year ago by gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world 101 comments fedilink hide all child comments Some key insights from the article: Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) shhh! how can we develop a whole new market to make the rich richer if you keep bringing those kinds of facts in here? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) What's the power source that doesn't do that? How do I advocate for it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] majster@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Firewood from your own forest is the only one and it's carbon neutral too. This is meant more as a joke but still. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago You aren't wrong, either, but if you start doing the numbers for how much forest per person we need, there isn't enough land. It is carbon neutral, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) What's the power source that doesn't do that? How do I advocate for it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] majster@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Firewood from your own forest is the only one and it's carbon neutral too. This is meant more as a joke but still. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago You aren't wrong, either, but if you start doing the numbers for how much forest per person we need, there isn't enough land. It is carbon neutral, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] majster@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Firewood from your own forest is the only one and it's carbon neutral too. This is meant more as a joke but still. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago You aren't wrong, either, but if you start doing the numbers for how much forest per person we need, there isn't enough land. It is carbon neutral, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago You aren't wrong, either, but if you start doing the numbers for how much forest per person we need, there isn't enough land. It is carbon neutral, though. permalink fedilink source parent