Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

shhh!

how can we develop a whole new market to make the rich richer if you keep bringing those kinds of facts in here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What's the power source that doesn't do that? How do I advocate for it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments