you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Well those things aren’t generative AI so there isn’t much of an issue with them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    What about 'edge enhancing' NNs like NNEDI3? Or GANs that absolutely 'paint in' inferred details from their training? How big is the model before it becomes 'generative?'

    What about a deinterlacer network that's been trained on other interlaced footage?

    My point is there is an infinitely fine gradient through time between good old MS paint/bilinear upscaling and ChatGPT (or locally runnable txt2img diffusion models). Even now, there's an array of modern ML-based 'editors' that are questionably generative most probably don't know are working in the background.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Id say if there is training beforehand, then its “generative AI”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments