▲ 61 ▼ Is WW3 more likely to accelerate or slow down anthropogenic climate change? (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 1 year ago by hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world 27 comments fedilink hide all child comments On one hand many countries will invest in heavy industry, manufacturing, and fall back to fossil fuels. On the other hand, economy overall should slow down and consumption of non-essential goods and services will drop. I'm not expecting any definite answers or numbers, of course, just some food for thought.
[+] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Iran tried farm-to-table nukes, but they weren't very popular. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works is leaking permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Iran tried farm-to-table nukes, but they weren't very popular. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works is leaking permalink fedilink source parent