you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

"Mate, I'm American. Get the fuck out of here with any Mexican praise." This is how you sound to anyone who sees through your thinly veiled racism and russophobia.

The soviet way was to have the elites be rich

Patently false propaganda. The Soviet Union was the most egalitarian that the region has ever seen.

They were doing pretty much what ICE is doing in the US right now - complain that your neighbour is a kulak, and they get removed

So you agree that people should be dying at 30 years of age in absolute poverty while working the lands for the landlords on exchange for a misery wage, dying of disease of starvation? Because that's what led to the mass popular support for dekulakization.

Plus the 5 year economic plans brought with them lovely things like the Holodomor.

The famine of the early 30s is a sad tragedy in Soviet history, but it's one of many famines that took place in the region from the time it was settled to begin with until the Soviets eliminated famines through industrial agriculture. While the first 5-year plans brought some misery such as the unforeseen sabotage of agriculture by kulaks, they also allowed the Soviet Union to industrialize at the quickest pace any country had industrialized up to that point, which is the main reason the Soviets were able to defeat the Nazis and save hundreds of millions of lives in the process.

China is going to have the most billionaires of any nation in probably less than a decade.

I have disagreements with some Chinese policy such as that, but the results are out there. If it weren't for communism, China would be a western colony, and would be on a similar standing to India, to which it can be very much compared at the beginning of the 1900s. Why is China so much more developed than India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia or Philippines? It's not a perfect country, but it's some of the best the world has to offer.

If you want an actual example of the success of communism, there’s always Cuba.

I fully agree, but why do you criticise dekulakization in the USSR and not the repressions against landlords in Cuba? Most Cubans were literal slaves under the landowners, and worked the lands for next to nothing. There was a measurable degree of repression against landlords, why aren't you crying your eyes out for them? Maybe just because you, as an Estonian, have been injected Russophobic racism in your life, in the same way that USians are injected anti-Mexican racism and Spaniards (like me) are injected anti-Moroccan racism? Why aren't you complaining about the lack of freedom of press in Cuba? Why aren't you complaining about the Cuban leaders having so much more than the Cuban people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    You're not local so you wouldn't know. The leaders hailed dekulakization as landlord removal but it was really just about anyone who was well off through their own family's labor too. And political opponents obviously. It was a dark time and we still mourn all the lives lost to the labor camps.

    Mexico never oppressed America like this. There's been conflicts, but the US was never forcefully occupied by Mexico.

  • source
  • parent