you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 174 points 1 year ago (6 children)

But Cuomo tried very hard to turn it into a referendum on Mamdani’s views on Israel and Palestine—and the media establishment took the bait.

It's weird this is an issue in a mayoral campaign in the USA. The role has no foreign policy authority whatsoever, and Palestine/Israel is 5700 miles from NYC.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 135 points 1 year ago* (16 children)

    He’s about to raise taxes on ~350k millionaires, while increasing wages and lowering the cost of groceries and rent. It’s everything Trump promised in his campaign, but he’s doing it the exact opposite way.

    When it works, Trump is gonna look like a dick, and the nation will see that democratic socialism will get them what they were promised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    the nation will see that democratic socialism will get them what they were promised.

    What's that old saying like "none are so blind as those who will not see"? I feel like people are so emotionally invested in "socialism bad, democrats bad" that it's going to be hard for them to accept contradicting that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's definitely true for many Republicans, but I think a successful term as mayor for Zohran has potential to really change things for the Democrats. If, after hearing from establishment Democrats for decades that the only way we can change things is so incrementally, not only can we not make progress, but we actually have to accept going backwards pretty often, you have a mayor who delivers some fairly sweeping changes, it could open the eyes of many Democrat voters to the lies that they've been fed by party leadership to excuse themselves for sitting on their hands while things fall apart around them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I think there's some truth to this. Specifically, a lot of people are sort of reflexively conservative. That is, they don't like change. If zohran gets free bus fare in, a lot of people who fight it now will fight to keep it.

    I think some famous conservative said something once about how they can't let social programs get in because people like them too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • Trump is already deeply unpopular in NYC, so it’s not likely to change anything on the national stage. New Yorkers have been seeing Trump’s BS on parade for decades now. It won’t change New York’s opinion of Trump.

    Nationally, it might. But that’s only if the media actually runs with it; The big news orgs are all in bed with the established politicians, so they’ll likely be smearing him left and right to avoid having it turn into a national shift.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago*

    Rent-stabilized apartments already exist in NYC. They are subject to regulations, so prices can be bureaucratically frozen.

    He has proposed city-owned grocery stores, that would save money on rent and property taxes, forcing competitive pricing on groceries in NYC, and reducing the insane inflation rates we see. During the bird flu, eggs hit $13/dozen, for example.

    He’s also looking to increase the city minimum wage to $30/hr, and make the city bus free for residents.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    New York City has its own income taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The existing one is set by the state, but I'm not aware of anything precluding the city for introducing its own. They wouldn't be set by the mayor's office as mayors don't actually make laws, but I don't see how this is a state matter. Certainly none of the coverage about it has said it's ultimately up to Hochul.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yes, but you're talking about the current taxes. Is there a law saying they can't institute additional taxes themselves? Because the proposed tax is an entirely separate thing and unless that's precluded by law the existing tax doesn't really matter. Adams had to go through the state because he wanted to reduce the existing tax.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There's a huge Jewish population in NYC, and many mistakenly assume that all of them support what Israel is doing. To a lot of people Judaism=Zionism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Even if that assumption were correct, the mayor of NYC cannot meaningfully aid or hinder Israel's actions. A politician's position on an issue far outside the scope of the office they're seeking doesn't usually influence my vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    There might be some things the mayor could do, like joining boycotts, etc.

    Certainly he can stop or interfere with the crackdown on pro-palestinian dissent in the city which has been extreme under Adams and Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That's a weird assumption. Many Jews strongly oppose it, including Bernie Sanders, Jon Stewart, Ben and Jerry from the ice cream, and probably millions of less famous Jews.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Plus, Israel is super unpopular right now. Mainstream media and establishment politicians don't get this. The more they criticize Mamdani for his lack of allegiance to Israel, the more people will vote for him!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    MSM used to know that they needed to smear anti-Israel candidates on other subjects. They got high on their own supply. Probably because they fired all the non zealots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think they are used to the old world in which being able to intentionally conflate being anti-Israel with "antisemitic" and have that bullshit being swallowed by most people.

    The days of them being gatekeepers on that in particular are long, long gone. It is and always was complete horseshit to label anyone critical of Israel running an open-air prison "antisemitic", but for most of my lifetime, that was just de rigueur. If anyone were to question it, you'd have most of the left and the right coming down on them.

    I think the more that MSM continues to try to cling that, the more they will lose credibility on lots of other things. At least some of them now seem to recognize that most of us think their "both sides" framing is complete horseshit and it's become nearly a punchline, finally, after all these years. They will probably cling to that even harder than the Israel gatekeeping they do. Related, I think they'll really resist calling the lying liars on the right out on their lies and invective the most.

    As an example, I constantly see most of them not even blink when a prominent Republican sits there and talks about the "Democrat Party". Anyone in media must know this is an intentional and constant slur and yet, they don't call them out on it. I'd like to see them sitting there and not correcting the Republicans and asking why they INSIST on this constant insult taken as nearly the same punchline as "both sides" framing is right now and start to change their behavior. They have been letting the Republicans do this for decades and they know full well what is going on, and do nothing. I'm so sick of that. It's no small thing, it's a corollary to the "both sides" framing that is so harmful to our nation - letting Republicans sit there and insult most of the country as well as lie brazenly and not get called out on it as to what they are doing....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Yeah the most bizarre thing to me was seeing the debate and hearing a question about foreign nation visits

    Like wtf is a city mayor doing visiting other countries and why would we care

    That was super weird. It was trying to bait out mamdani and other progressive views about Israel but man what a word question for a mayoral race

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    NYPD has a field office in Kfar Saba. So, possibly more pertinent than it should be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments