1153
New Vaccine Can Completely Reverse Autoimmune Diseases Like Multiple Sclerosis, Type 1 Diabetes, and Crohn’s Disease (scitechdaily.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
238 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Researchers from Pritzker Molecular Engineering, under the guidance of Prof. Jeffrey Hubbell, demonstrated that their compound can eliminate the autoimmune response linked to multiple sclerosis. Researchers at the University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering (PME) have developed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 2 years ago (31 children)

Unpopular opinion: Anyone who refused the COVID vaccine should be banned from getting this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
    •
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Honestly asking, why even bring this up? What does this have to do with the topic of the post?

    All you do is start an argument and divert away from the topic that was supposed to be discussed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You don't want to get a vaccine to help others + yourself, you shouldn't be allowed to "believe in science" when it benefits you and only you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    You don’t want to get a vaccine to help others + yourself, you shouldn’t be allowed to “believe in science” when it benefits you and only you.

    Such a non-sequitur answer. And for the record, I'm fully vaccinated.

    Go somewhere else to talk about your favorite vaccine. Don't DERAIL this conversation about a completely different vaccine.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don’t DERAIL this conversation about a completely different vaccine.

    I was replying to a question. Please follow the context thread, or go away.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don’t DERAIL this conversation about a completely different vaccine.

    I was replying to a question. Please follow the context thread, or go away.

    Here's what you said, context wise ...

    Unpopular opinion: Anyone who refused the COVID vaccine should be banned from getting this.

    You weren't responding to a question, you were just offering your own opinion, an opinion that was different from the topic and the context of the conversation being discussed, and hence my reply to you, calling you out for it.

    You're being intellectually dishonest.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ya, I am allowed to post my opinion. I don't think people who refuse a vaccine that can help save others should be allowed to receive a vaccine that benefits only them.

    If you're upset, you're part of the problem. Not my fault. If you don't want to see my comments, which I am free to post, block me.

    In fact, don't worry about it. I will block you, because your reply is insane. Literally complaining to me because I posted my opinion, and then calling me intellectually dishonest. Nutters.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    Ya, I am allowed to post my opinion.

    No one says you're not. The only point I was making is you're posting your opinion in the wrong place and you're 'muddying the waters' of the conversation.

    That point was said straightforward to you, but you chose to ignore it and try to move the goal posts onto something else.

    If you’re upset, you’re part of the problem. Not my fault.

    I'm not upset at all, I was just asking a question, why are you expressing an opinion that doesn't match the conversation being had and that you know would be inflammatory and pollute the conversation.

    You keep trying to warp the meaning of my initial critique of your initial opinion into something else to win an Internet argument.

    You continue to be intellectually dishonest.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    People are saying it causes 5g.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Can I get it, I want strong signal at all times.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    6g comes out, carriers push everyone to get new 6g phones as the 5g networks get worked over. Bunch of vaxxers just walking around like "Nah, mine's fine. Why spend hundreds on a new one? 🤷" AT&T and Samsung suddenly sponsoring research to undo vaccinations and turn the frogs hetero 🤣

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You’re going to need a booster every year to continue getting good reception or more g’s

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Not that i necessarily support this policy, but to the people who are acting all offended at the idea you might be cut off from future scientific advances because of you're hurting the public good ("Consequences? For my actions?!"): You could just get the vaccine.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (24 replies)