924
Title (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
243 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

Like who? Making an actual living I mean, not just collecting small donations to 'buy them a coffee' or whatever.

Not saying you're wrong, but some examples would be welcome.

Edit: Down voting me for asking a question, lol. Way to demonstrate your dedication to that free and open philosophy you apparently advocate for, folks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Blender, Wikipedia, Linux, RedHat and even the project you're using right now: Lemmy

    There actually are a lot of people making a living out of making open source projects

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Ill admit im not very familiar with blender, linux, or redhat, so ill look into those -- thank you.

    My understanding is that nobody owns lemmy, rather people own the instances that make up lemmy. Which is definitely in the spirit of FOSS, but based on my understanding (happy to be proven wrong) I dont think its accurate to say the creators of Lemmy are making a living from it. You can donate to the admins of the instances you use, I suppose.

    Likewise, isn't the main source of income for Wikipedia donations? They ask me for one every time I'm on the site.

    So other than semantics, what's really the difference in making a donation to a service like Wikipedia, and paying for Sync? You can think of paying to remove ads as a donation if that helps, but the fact remains that lemmy is already available for free, and is much smaller than organizations like Wikipedia or Linux. Dude has got to eat.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Compleatly forgot to answer your other quesntion:

    Yes the main income is donations. The difference is that you don't need to pay if you can't afford it and people who donate are generally paying more on average. The huge difference is that everyone has access to everything without paying.

    Imagine what would happen if you would have to pay to use Wikipedia: nobody would use it. The content is made by users and if they would have made it a paid encyclopedia it wouldn't have any users.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago*

    Also, I gladly pay for subscriptions for services that actually cost money to run in the developer's side.

    But that's not the case. It shows content from a free service. I get it that developers need to get paid, but if they don't have any recurring expenditure, it should be based on donations.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    You don't need to pay for Sync if you can't afford it either, though. A free version exists, the only noteworthy difference is that it shows ads. To your point, there are technically a few gated features behind the Ultra subscription, but these are niche inclusions that 99% of people probably wouldn't use even if they were included for free. I think of them more as an added bonus for supporting the dev.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    See: RedHat devs and all the FOSS orgs that actually pay devs to work on their shit.

    Google, Meta, and AMD have people on their to team they pay for development on FOSS projects because their operations rely upon them, so they have a vested interest in maintaining them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    So the best solution to make a living as a FOSS developer is to... Work for some giant tech monopoly who engages in sketchy consumer practices on a regular basis?

    AFAIK Sync was created by a single person, so I doubt he's getting paid by anyone other than fans of the app and ad revenue. I'll look into RedHat though, I appreciate you taking the time to provide an actual example.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    Not a problem. Also FOSS orgs pay their devs as well. Off the top of my head OS developers with a large userbase often pay their devs through donations to foundations that fund the project. Often donors are companies as well, but it gives a developer the option to get paid without working for a massive company.

    (I suppose indirectly they do, but that's a whole different ball of wax)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    He means provide an example of a single indie Dev doing it. You're being obtuse because you know that there's no one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I don't understand. I reread back to the top comment and went down the chain. They made a rhetorical question about how devs of software being paid. Someone clarified the definition of Foss. Then there was a an inquiry about how someone could make a living with FOSS software and another commenter claiming millions do it (which a majority are these exact devs I pointed out).

    I simply gave the list, that's all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent