▲ 240 ▼ Steam Deck OS 3.5 Preview - Steam News (store.steampowered.com) submitted 2 years ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.fmhy.net to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] explodes@lemmy.one 42 points 2 years ago (1 child) Patch notes says "HDR can now be enabled in Display Settings if supported by the external display." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sadreality@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (2 children) Ohh wow... Is this the first proper Linux HDR implementation? Hopefully it spreads to desktop too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] telemachuszero@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) There was a HDR hackfest earlier this year. A couple of reports from after the event if you're interested https://emersion.fr/blog/2023/hdr-hackfest-wrap-up/ + https://blogs.gnome.org/shell-dev/2023/05/04/vivid-colors-in-brno/. It also got a brief mention in the System76 blog https://blog.system76.com/post/may-flowers-spring-cosmic-showers. So it's being worked on, and it seems all involved are trying to get it right - it sounds like gamescope on SteamOS doesn't need to worry about solving all the problems that general purpose desktop compositors will have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] semperverus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Getting everyone to agree on a single standard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Desktop Linux had been a bit behind the others on display features due to the legacy of X. As everybody moves more to Wayland that better enables these sorts of things, they're catching up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the person above you asked 😃 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sadreality@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago (2 children) Ohh wow... Is this the first proper Linux HDR implementation? Hopefully it spreads to desktop too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] telemachuszero@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) There was a HDR hackfest earlier this year. A couple of reports from after the event if you're interested https://emersion.fr/blog/2023/hdr-hackfest-wrap-up/ + https://blogs.gnome.org/shell-dev/2023/05/04/vivid-colors-in-brno/. It also got a brief mention in the System76 blog https://blog.system76.com/post/may-flowers-spring-cosmic-showers. So it's being worked on, and it seems all involved are trying to get it right - it sounds like gamescope on SteamOS doesn't need to worry about solving all the problems that general purpose desktop compositors will have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] semperverus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Getting everyone to agree on a single standard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Desktop Linux had been a bit behind the others on display features due to the legacy of X. As everybody moves more to Wayland that better enables these sorts of things, they're catching up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the person above you asked 😃 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] telemachuszero@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) There was a HDR hackfest earlier this year. A couple of reports from after the event if you're interested https://emersion.fr/blog/2023/hdr-hackfest-wrap-up/ + https://blogs.gnome.org/shell-dev/2023/05/04/vivid-colors-in-brno/. It also got a brief mention in the System76 blog https://blog.system76.com/post/may-flowers-spring-cosmic-showers. So it's being worked on, and it seems all involved are trying to get it right - it sounds like gamescope on SteamOS doesn't need to worry about solving all the problems that general purpose desktop compositors will have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] kadu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] semperverus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Getting everyone to agree on a single standard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Desktop Linux had been a bit behind the others on display features due to the legacy of X. As everybody moves more to Wayland that better enables these sorts of things, they're catching up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] kadu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] semperverus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Getting everyone to agree on a single standard. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Desktop Linux had been a bit behind the others on display features due to the legacy of X. As everybody moves more to Wayland that better enables these sorts of things, they're catching up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago Getting everyone to agree on a single standard. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Desktop Linux had been a bit behind the others on display features due to the legacy of X. As everybody moves more to Wayland that better enables these sorts of things, they're catching up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) If only people stopped buying Nvidia... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1... Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If only AMD would catch up with DLSS DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) FSR is open source. Patches welcome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol. AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 point 2 years ago @HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the person above you asked 😃 permalink fedilink source parent