you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Did they share any receipts or official documents to back up their claims?

They have a really good racket going on and want to make sure people keep giving them way more money than is necessary. It's simply not true that Infosec.Exchange requires $5000/month to operate unless they're doing something very wrong or just straight up lying.

Money brings out the worst in people. Don't let the useful idiots bring you down because there are more of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    They have a really good racket going on and want to make sure people keep giving them way more money than is necessary. It's simply not true that Infosec.Exchange requires $5000/month to operate unless they're doing something very wrong or just straight up lying.

    Yes, internet rando. I totally believe your solid calculations based on .. vibe?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We failed the instance operators if they need to lie about money. What we need to insure is that those people can both run the instance and live a live worth of envy from the money provided by the supporters. Meaning any money above the costs is good money. Any money below the margin of live worthy of envy is not enough money. The line is not at being able to pay for hosting. The line is at live worthy of envy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments