you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I think it should be like 7 days, but 2 days seems too short.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Depends on the action needed.

    Personally, I feel like for health and safety items, after 48 hours the renter should be able to call someone to do the repair on their behalf and bill the landlord any reasonable fees / withhold that money from the next month’s rent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Yeah some work requiring contractors can take days to even find someone who can fit you into their schedule. 2 days seems great for critical to life things like no heat/ac, no functioning water/sewer, etc. But like, roof damage, a broken window? shit like that? Larger jobs It'll take at least a week to get a crew scheduled to even show up, and seems like an unreasonable legal burden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    A short time frame is fine because the consequences for missing it is that rent is delayed until the repair is complete, or the tenant is authorized to arrange for repairs themselves and deduct the costs from the rent. Neither of those are onerous so there doesn't need to be a long grace period.

    This is also specifically for safety related repairs. It's not like a tenant can withhold rent for a broken window screen or dripping faucet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The wording seems to be that repairs must start within 48 hours, which is reasonable. Landlords could likely successfully argue that ordering replacement parts or having a someone scheduled to come out counts as starting or commencement.

  • source
  • parent