▲ 961 ▼ Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Received Zero Votes in a New York County (www.latintimes.com) submitted 1 year ago by kinther@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 227 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (6 children) I will point out that this cannot change the result of the presidential election, since Trump didn't win the state in question anyway. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 73 points 1 year ago (1 child) It might open an investigation into other places. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Like in Pennsylvania, perhaps, where he all but admitted to fucking with the voting machines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Or Michigan and Wisconsin where the machines are easily audited permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like it actually happened and there was no evidence of fraud permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like a partial recount isn't enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 year ago It depends on who did the cheating and how prolific it is in other states and counties. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago The point is that it all needs to be looked at and reverified permalink fedilink source parent [–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* I will point out that if they did it in a state they weren't going to win and that would be too suspicious for them to actually win in the first place, why wouldn't they replicate it in a state they actually needed and on which his election actually hinged? Just means New York was a control/test case permalink fedilink source parent [–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Frankly after election there are two things that bugged me in California. There was a proposition that removed mandatory work requirement for inmates comparing it to a modern day slavery. There was no one who was willing to endorse vote against it (I suppose due to optics) yet the proposition failed. When he visited CA after fires were already put down and made that spectacle with water dam, he also mentioned that he had a good feeling about next election. I have a feeling that maybe CA voting is also compromised and this was a test for California, as trump winning here would be extremely suspicious, but no one will care about this proposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago That one isn't suspicious to me. US public opinion has always had very little regard for anyone who's incarcerated. Hence, once the system gets ahold of you, you're fucked whether you're guilty or not (unless you're wealthy). permalink fedilink source parent [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago There should be penalties for a lot of things that are and have been happening. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 73 points 1 year ago (1 child) It might open an investigation into other places. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Like in Pennsylvania, perhaps, where he all but admitted to fucking with the voting machines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Or Michigan and Wisconsin where the machines are easily audited permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like it actually happened and there was no evidence of fraud permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like a partial recount isn't enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Like in Pennsylvania, perhaps, where he all but admitted to fucking with the voting machines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Or Michigan and Wisconsin where the machines are easily audited permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like it actually happened and there was no evidence of fraud permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like a partial recount isn't enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Or Michigan and Wisconsin where the machines are easily audited permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like it actually happened and there was no evidence of fraud permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like a partial recount isn't enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like it actually happened and there was no evidence of fraud permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like a partial recount isn't enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Almost like a partial recount isn't enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Casual dismissal of statistically relevant recount and largest recount ever in Wisconsin, even including compared to 2020. Local elections officials in 336 randomly selected municipalities across the state hand-counted 327,230 ballots as part of the 2024 audit. That is nearly 10% of all Wisconsin ballots cast in the 2024 election and the largest post-election audit ever undertaken in the state. The only errors found during the audit were made by people, not the vote-counting machines. And only five human errors were detected, resulting in an error rate of just 0.0000009%, according to the report. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. I read that. I'm also familiar with the voting village at defcon. They had years to plan and do recon. Half measures don't cut it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 year ago It depends on who did the cheating and how prolific it is in other states and counties. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago The point is that it all needs to be looked at and reverified permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* I will point out that if they did it in a state they weren't going to win and that would be too suspicious for them to actually win in the first place, why wouldn't they replicate it in a state they actually needed and on which his election actually hinged? Just means New York was a control/test case permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Frankly after election there are two things that bugged me in California. There was a proposition that removed mandatory work requirement for inmates comparing it to a modern day slavery. There was no one who was willing to endorse vote against it (I suppose due to optics) yet the proposition failed. When he visited CA after fires were already put down and made that spectacle with water dam, he also mentioned that he had a good feeling about next election. I have a feeling that maybe CA voting is also compromised and this was a test for California, as trump winning here would be extremely suspicious, but no one will care about this proposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago That one isn't suspicious to me. US public opinion has always had very little regard for anyone who's incarcerated. Hence, once the system gets ahold of you, you're fucked whether you're guilty or not (unless you're wealthy). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago That one isn't suspicious to me. US public opinion has always had very little regard for anyone who's incarcerated. Hence, once the system gets ahold of you, you're fucked whether you're guilty or not (unless you're wealthy). permalink fedilink source parent
[+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago There should be penalties for a lot of things that are and have been happening. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago There should be penalties for a lot of things that are and have been happening. permalink fedilink source parent