▲ 135 ▼ American bully XL dogs to be banned by end of year - Sunak (www.bbc.co.uk) submitted 2 years ago by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk 97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] GanonMS@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (3 children) Then why most of the attacks are by this breed? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago At least partly because scumbags who want to abuse a dog until it's violent and dangerous don't buy shih tzus to start with. If you ban a breed because it's "dangerous" you'll see people defy it, evade it through hybridizing (which already happened, the bully xl is a hybrid of the already-banned bull terrier) or just start abusing and selectively breeding a different large breed until it's as violent as this breed. I'm not even necessarily against sunsetting this breed, it feels like we're in a situation where a lot of bad decisions we've made in the past have made this a good decision. But I think that there are a lot of core problems that won't be solved just by playing whack a mole with the current breed making headlines permalink fedilink source parent [–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago Same reason Dobermans and Pit Bulls are the most abused Dogs in the US. permalink fedilink source parent [+] PoopingCough@lemmy.world -13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Because when they do attack they are capable of doing serious damage; enough to be reported. No one is gonna report a dachshund attack for example so statistically it looks like dachshunds never attack people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Harmonics0417@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago Which means they are more dangerous. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago At least partly because scumbags who want to abuse a dog until it's violent and dangerous don't buy shih tzus to start with. If you ban a breed because it's "dangerous" you'll see people defy it, evade it through hybridizing (which already happened, the bully xl is a hybrid of the already-banned bull terrier) or just start abusing and selectively breeding a different large breed until it's as violent as this breed. I'm not even necessarily against sunsetting this breed, it feels like we're in a situation where a lot of bad decisions we've made in the past have made this a good decision. But I think that there are a lot of core problems that won't be solved just by playing whack a mole with the current breed making headlines permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago Same reason Dobermans and Pit Bulls are the most abused Dogs in the US. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] PoopingCough@lemmy.world -13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Because when they do attack they are capable of doing serious damage; enough to be reported. No one is gonna report a dachshund attack for example so statistically it looks like dachshunds never attack people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Harmonics0417@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago Which means they are more dangerous. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Harmonics0417@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago Which means they are more dangerous. permalink fedilink source parent