you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Then why most of the attacks are by this breed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    At least partly because scumbags who want to abuse a dog until it's violent and dangerous don't buy shih tzus to start with. If you ban a breed because it's "dangerous" you'll see people defy it, evade it through hybridizing (which already happened, the bully xl is a hybrid of the already-banned bull terrier) or just start abusing and selectively breeding a different large breed until it's as violent as this breed. I'm not even necessarily against sunsetting this breed, it feels like we're in a situation where a lot of bad decisions we've made in the past have made this a good decision. But I think that there are a lot of core problems that won't be solved just by playing whack a mole with the current breed making headlines

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Because when they do attack they are capable of doing serious damage; enough to be reported. No one is gonna report a dachshund attack for example so statistically it looks like dachshunds never attack people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments