▲ 280 ▼ Gen Z may think they have it rough but millennials are the most burned-out generation (fortune.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gadfly1999@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 child) And now that it’s lower the billionaires are happy to pay their fair share and society is better off for it. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you have a source for that? I found this source that is citing data from the congressional budget office. SOURCE (I followed the link and did confirm the numbers match). I made a quick plot so it was easier to see trends. Nothing stands out to me about 1983 - there's a small dip and then a course correction back towards the upwards trajectory, but this data tells us nothin about wealth inequality. We can't use total values because of inflation and such , probably have to use revenue as a %GDP or something but I'm too lazy too keep searching at the moment :) My immediate thought looking at the plot is this: If the total tax rev kept going up, and the top tax rate was cut, then the increased tax burden must have shifted to the poorer classes; I'd have to verify but it seems like a logical conclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gadfly1999@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 child) And now that it’s lower the billionaires are happy to pay their fair share and society is better off for it. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Do you have a source for that? I found this source that is citing data from the congressional budget office. SOURCE (I followed the link and did confirm the numbers match). I made a quick plot so it was easier to see trends. Nothing stands out to me about 1983 - there's a small dip and then a course correction back towards the upwards trajectory, but this data tells us nothin about wealth inequality. We can't use total values because of inflation and such , probably have to use revenue as a %GDP or something but I'm too lazy too keep searching at the moment :) My immediate thought looking at the plot is this: If the total tax rev kept going up, and the top tax rate was cut, then the increased tax burden must have shifted to the poorer classes; I'd have to verify but it seems like a logical conclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent