▲ 247 ▼ Those of you that have negative sentiments towards AI: What would you want to happen right now? (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago* by venusaur@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 271 comments fedilink hide all child comments Lots of people on Lemmy really dislike AI’s current implementations and use cases. I’m trying to understand what people would want to be happening right now. Destroy gen AI? Implement laws? Hoping all companies use it for altruistic purposes to help all of mankind? Thanks for the discourse. Please keep it civil, but happy to be your punching bag.
[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things are weirder than they seem on the surface. A math professor collegue of mine calls extremely restrictive use of language ”rigor”, for example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Libra@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) The point isn't that it's restrictive, the point is that words have precise technical meanings that are the same across authors, speakers, and time. It's rigorous because of that precision and consistency, not just because it's restrictive. It's necessary to be rigorous with use of language in scientific fields where clear communication is difficult but important to get right due to the complexity of the ideas at play. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago Yeah sure buddy. Have you tried to shoehorn real life stuff into mathematical notation? It is restrictive. You have pre-defined strict boxes that don’t have blurry lines. Free form thoughts are a lot more flexible than that. Consistency is restrictive. I don’t know why you take issue with that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) The point isn't that it's restrictive, the point is that words have precise technical meanings that are the same across authors, speakers, and time. It's rigorous because of that precision and consistency, not just because it's restrictive. It's necessary to be rigorous with use of language in scientific fields where clear communication is difficult but important to get right due to the complexity of the ideas at play. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago Yeah sure buddy. Have you tried to shoehorn real life stuff into mathematical notation? It is restrictive. You have pre-defined strict boxes that don’t have blurry lines. Free form thoughts are a lot more flexible than that. Consistency is restrictive. I don’t know why you take issue with that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago Yeah sure buddy. Have you tried to shoehorn real life stuff into mathematical notation? It is restrictive. You have pre-defined strict boxes that don’t have blurry lines. Free form thoughts are a lot more flexible than that. Consistency is restrictive. I don’t know why you take issue with that. permalink fedilink source parent