▲ 186 ▼ StackOverflow activity down to 2008 numbers (aussie.zone) submitted 1 year ago by Eyekaytee@aussie.zone to c/localllama@sh.itjust.works 45 comments fedilink hide all child comments from 10b0t0mized: I miss the days when I had to go through a humiliation ritual before getting my questions answered. Now days you can just ask your questions from an infinitely patient entity, AI is really terrible.
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) How do you disallow LLMs to train on their data while still allowing humans to train on their data? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago If they can charge for it. It means they can block it. https://www.wired.com/story/stack-overflow-will-charge-ai-giants-for-training-data/ You can also rate-limit. Blacklist known scrapper IPs. And if it doesn't work. You make signing-in not optional. Which makes rate-limiting way easier. The rate of human data consumption is much lower than LLM's. The humans won't even notice that they have a rate limit. At most they would only notice the need to create a stack overflow account. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago If they can charge for it. It means they can block it. https://www.wired.com/story/stack-overflow-will-charge-ai-giants-for-training-data/ You can also rate-limit. Blacklist known scrapper IPs. And if it doesn't work. You make signing-in not optional. Which makes rate-limiting way easier. The rate of human data consumption is much lower than LLM's. The humans won't even notice that they have a rate limit. At most they would only notice the need to create a stack overflow account. permalink fedilink source parent
