you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Romania probably.

They went hard on fiber investments a decade or two ago and now they have some of the world's best internet.

Last I checked you could get 10 Gbit for around 12€

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Last I checked you could get 10 Gbit for around 12€

    then it would be €1200 for a TB (assuming the price goes up linearly), so not cheaper than starlink

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    10 Gbit as in speed, not data cap. In Europe (at least in most places afaik) we don't have data caps on fiber.
    So no, not even close.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Then you should write Gbit/s or Gbps, not just Gbit

    Also I live in Europe and my internet is capped at 50 GB and the max speed is 30 Mbps, so 10 Gbps is baffling to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also in Europe (Germany). A cap to home Internet is kinda crazy to me. I don't measure my usage, but when I did, I usually used about 2-3tb per month.

    I have 1gbps down/300mbps up for 50€. Price is shit compared to other parts of Europe, but I can live with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I usually used about 2-3tb per month

    are we talking about a whole household or just you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Just me. Since I took that measurement, I changed my habits. I download fewer games, I stream a lot more stuff locally, but I also added a server to my network that does a lot of stuff, including relatively high bitrate video streaming to ten users, so it's probably even more these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think you’re misreading that as “10 GB of data,” when it’s actually download speeds of 10Gb/s. I looked it up, and there doesn’t seem to be a data cap.

    So it’s quite a bit cheaper than Starlink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not misreading. The comment clearly says 10 Gbit, not 10 Gb/s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    While you are technically correct, gigabit almost universally refers to speeds, and not size. You can probably blame the ISPs for that, since they love to advertise “gigabit service” and drop the bit about “per second.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    well you can't blame me for misunderstanding the comment then can you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments