Nougat comments on After an Arizona man was shot, an AI video of him addresses his killer in court

Our Rules

Only tech related news or articles.

Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.

Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.

Politics threads may be removed.

No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.

Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.

Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Not at all, because it would have been her making claims about what she believes her brother would have said, and not a simulacrum of her brother speaking her words with his voice.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

But that's what she did. She was upfront about the fact that it was an AI video reciting a script that she'd written.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

You can say that all you want, but when your brain is presented with a video of a person, using that person's voice, you're going to take what's being said as being from that person in the video.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

True, many people would have that problem, which is why the context in which the video was shown was acceptable; it was after the verdict had been given.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago

Such a thing should not impact sentencing, either. The judge allowed it, the judge was swayed by it, it impacted sentencing. This is wrong.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4