▲ 186 ▼ China turns on ‘minors mode’ to keep kids safe online (www.theregister.com) submitted 1 year ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) This isn't for the kid's benefit you know permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The point is censorship of viewpoints permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) And my point is that certain viewpoints are already being censored on the major platforms. Say something anti-MAGA on YouTube the next time you get a chance, then load the page in an incognito window. You'll notice that your comment is nowhere to be found. Check your comment history, and you'll see a "some activity might not be visible yet" message at the top. Yet anything praising Trump gets to stay. Google/Meta/etc.are dangerous entities that are poisoning kids' minds with conservative propaganda, and no one seems to notice or care. Something needs to be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) These laws are about censoring LGBT stuff, you think the MAGAs would do anything about MAGA propaganda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago I hear they are very good at execution too! permalink fedilink source parent [–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago You don't want kids to research, let's say controversial, content of CCP wrongs and critism of policies ofc. Totally a smart move permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) This isn't for the kid's benefit you know permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The point is censorship of viewpoints permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) And my point is that certain viewpoints are already being censored on the major platforms. Say something anti-MAGA on YouTube the next time you get a chance, then load the page in an incognito window. You'll notice that your comment is nowhere to be found. Check your comment history, and you'll see a "some activity might not be visible yet" message at the top. Yet anything praising Trump gets to stay. Google/Meta/etc.are dangerous entities that are poisoning kids' minds with conservative propaganda, and no one seems to notice or care. Something needs to be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) These laws are about censoring LGBT stuff, you think the MAGAs would do anything about MAGA propaganda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago I hear they are very good at execution too! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The point is censorship of viewpoints permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) And my point is that certain viewpoints are already being censored on the major platforms. Say something anti-MAGA on YouTube the next time you get a chance, then load the page in an incognito window. You'll notice that your comment is nowhere to be found. Check your comment history, and you'll see a "some activity might not be visible yet" message at the top. Yet anything praising Trump gets to stay. Google/Meta/etc.are dangerous entities that are poisoning kids' minds with conservative propaganda, and no one seems to notice or care. Something needs to be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) These laws are about censoring LGBT stuff, you think the MAGAs would do anything about MAGA propaganda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago I hear they are very good at execution too! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The point is censorship of viewpoints permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) And my point is that certain viewpoints are already being censored on the major platforms. Say something anti-MAGA on YouTube the next time you get a chance, then load the page in an incognito window. You'll notice that your comment is nowhere to be found. Check your comment history, and you'll see a "some activity might not be visible yet" message at the top. Yet anything praising Trump gets to stay. Google/Meta/etc.are dangerous entities that are poisoning kids' minds with conservative propaganda, and no one seems to notice or care. Something needs to be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) These laws are about censoring LGBT stuff, you think the MAGAs would do anything about MAGA propaganda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) And my point is that certain viewpoints are already being censored on the major platforms. Say something anti-MAGA on YouTube the next time you get a chance, then load the page in an incognito window. You'll notice that your comment is nowhere to be found. Check your comment history, and you'll see a "some activity might not be visible yet" message at the top. Yet anything praising Trump gets to stay. Google/Meta/etc.are dangerous entities that are poisoning kids' minds with conservative propaganda, and no one seems to notice or care. Something needs to be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) These laws are about censoring LGBT stuff, you think the MAGAs would do anything about MAGA propaganda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) These laws are about censoring LGBT stuff, you think the MAGAs would do anything about MAGA propaganda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Psythik@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, and I don't support censorship even if it's aimed at kids (they always start with the kids first) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* And again, the major platforms already are engaging in censorship. I'm merely suggesting that we do something about it. I hope you realize that talking to you is fatiguing. For your sake I hope you're not this annoying to have a conversation with in person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago I hear they are very good at execution too! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago You don't want kids to research, let's say controversial, content of CCP wrongs and critism of policies ofc. Totally a smart move permalink fedilink source parent