▲ 945 ▼ Mark my words: they will put Kamala 2.0. or Gavin in the race for president instead of AOC or any other progressive. (feddit.org) submitted 1 year ago by Kennystillalive@feddit.org to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 367 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) They already could have had a progressive candidate in 2016. They chose otherwise. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) the progessive dint vote for bernie twice. thats on them, and i always see them blaming the other dems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) The DNC didn’t want a progressive or “grassroots“ candidate. No matter how many people voted for Bernie in the primaries. The DNC was set on Clinton and Biden. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] spectre@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Bernie literally got fewer votes. It absolutely does matter how many people vote for him? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago During the primaries in 2016 Wassermann-Schultz literally said that they don’t want a grassroots candidate. They were always set on Clinton no matter what, and they caiboshed Bernie wherever they could. I wonder how many votes he lost because of it. I guess we’ll never know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago the numbers dont lie, reports came out soon after the elections, that less progressive voted for him both times, they were all up in tiktok, but none showed up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) the progessive dint vote for bernie twice. thats on them, and i always see them blaming the other dems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) The DNC didn’t want a progressive or “grassroots“ candidate. No matter how many people voted for Bernie in the primaries. The DNC was set on Clinton and Biden. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] spectre@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Bernie literally got fewer votes. It absolutely does matter how many people vote for him? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago During the primaries in 2016 Wassermann-Schultz literally said that they don’t want a grassroots candidate. They were always set on Clinton no matter what, and they caiboshed Bernie wherever they could. I wonder how many votes he lost because of it. I guess we’ll never know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago the numbers dont lie, reports came out soon after the elections, that less progressive voted for him both times, they were all up in tiktok, but none showed up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) The DNC didn’t want a progressive or “grassroots“ candidate. No matter how many people voted for Bernie in the primaries. The DNC was set on Clinton and Biden. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] spectre@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Bernie literally got fewer votes. It absolutely does matter how many people vote for him? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago During the primaries in 2016 Wassermann-Schultz literally said that they don’t want a grassroots candidate. They were always set on Clinton no matter what, and they caiboshed Bernie wherever they could. I wonder how many votes he lost because of it. I guess we’ll never know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago the numbers dont lie, reports came out soon after the elections, that less progressive voted for him both times, they were all up in tiktok, but none showed up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spectre@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Bernie literally got fewer votes. It absolutely does matter how many people vote for him? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago During the primaries in 2016 Wassermann-Schultz literally said that they don’t want a grassroots candidate. They were always set on Clinton no matter what, and they caiboshed Bernie wherever they could. I wonder how many votes he lost because of it. I guess we’ll never know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SamHoppers@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago During the primaries in 2016 Wassermann-Schultz literally said that they don’t want a grassroots candidate. They were always set on Clinton no matter what, and they caiboshed Bernie wherever they could. I wonder how many votes he lost because of it. I guess we’ll never know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago the numbers dont lie, reports came out soon after the elections, that less progressive voted for him both times, they were all up in tiktok, but none showed up. permalink fedilink source parent
