you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 109 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Cars produce more harmful airbourne pollutants from their brakes than they do from the tailpipe. Copper is being phased out and the ultimate goal is to abandon friction braking entirely in favour of electrical regeneration.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    How much from tires when braking? I was under the impression that tires (edit: cats!) produce more pm2.5 from tires than brakes, which in turn account for more than the exhaust.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I always understood tire deg to be microplastic/rubber not pm2.5. Brutal for the ecosystem around roadways and water bodies. Ultimately adding to the micro plastic pollution globally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    The pm2.5 refers to the particle diameter and incorporates any particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in size. So particulate matter and microplastics are not necessarily a contradiction

    But good that you brought it up, I did some googling and umweltdialog.de writes that microplastics from tires make up one third of Germany's microplastics pollution! That's an insane amount!

    It's late here, so I won't read it today, but the Fraunhofer Research Institute did a study called "TireWearMapping", which promises to contain a ton of information on the creation and distribution of tire based pollutants: https://www.umsicht.fraunhofer.de/de/projekte/tyrewearmapping.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Cars produce more harmful airbourne pollutants from their brakes than they do from the tailpipe.

    That's why you never live nearby a freeway or major highway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    People brake less often on highways?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That’s why you never live nearby a freeway or major highway.

    People brake less often on highways?

    Versus freeways? I would imagine not, that they would be roughly similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Where I live, freeways and highways are the same thing, so I'm confused here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Where I live, freeways and highways are the same thing, so I’m confused here.

    Oh they're definitely different here.

    Freeways are usually eight length cement highways with an impassable divider in the middle and no buildings on their immediate sides, just off ramps.

    Highways are usually two or four lane roads that you can pull off of at any point to go to a building. They have more traffic than regular city streets, but they're not considered throughways like freeways are.

    To my point I made earlier that you reply to about the confusion, I wasn't speaking so much about breaking, but just the faster you go the more tire wear and tear and hence the more tire dust you get to breathe, as well as emergency braking for sudden stops or lane changes, etc. City streets cars are usually a little more tame and mundane speedwise than they are on highways and freeways.

  • source
  • parent