β² 948 βΌ Linux For Life (lemm.ee) submitted 1 year ago by azha@lemm.ee to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 169 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] DmMacniel@feddit.org 67 points 1 year ago (1 child) yeah we have SIGTERM for graceful and SIGKILL for not so graceful shutting down a process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] palordrolap@fedia.io 30 points 1 year ago (2 children) In order of decreasing politeness: 1, 2, 15, 9 = HUP, INT, TERM, KILL = "Please stop", "Quit it", "I'm warning you" and "BANG" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] jj4211@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hup is frequently just "hey, reread your configuration files and keep going" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] palordrolap@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago True. I think of it more as a semantic shift. In the old days, processes would actually quit and some other process would resurrect it as necessary, but then someone had the idea of having some processes catch the HUP and do all that itself without actually bothering any other processes. And the implementation might actually involve an exec of the process' own executable, meaning that it actually does self-terminate, but it leaves a child in its place. permalink fedilink source parent [β] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) 9 kills all 9 lives is they way the hpunix guy explained it to me in the mid 90s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago This is put so beautifully! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] palordrolap@fedia.io 30 points 1 year ago (2 children) In order of decreasing politeness: 1, 2, 15, 9 = HUP, INT, TERM, KILL = "Please stop", "Quit it", "I'm warning you" and "BANG" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] jj4211@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hup is frequently just "hey, reread your configuration files and keep going" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] palordrolap@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago True. I think of it more as a semantic shift. In the old days, processes would actually quit and some other process would resurrect it as necessary, but then someone had the idea of having some processes catch the HUP and do all that itself without actually bothering any other processes. And the implementation might actually involve an exec of the process' own executable, meaning that it actually does self-terminate, but it leaves a child in its place. permalink fedilink source parent [β] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) 9 kills all 9 lives is they way the hpunix guy explained it to me in the mid 90s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago This is put so beautifully! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] jj4211@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hup is frequently just "hey, reread your configuration files and keep going" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] palordrolap@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago True. I think of it more as a semantic shift. In the old days, processes would actually quit and some other process would resurrect it as necessary, but then someone had the idea of having some processes catch the HUP and do all that itself without actually bothering any other processes. And the implementation might actually involve an exec of the process' own executable, meaning that it actually does self-terminate, but it leaves a child in its place. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] palordrolap@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago True. I think of it more as a semantic shift. In the old days, processes would actually quit and some other process would resurrect it as necessary, but then someone had the idea of having some processes catch the HUP and do all that itself without actually bothering any other processes. And the implementation might actually involve an exec of the process' own executable, meaning that it actually does self-terminate, but it leaves a child in its place. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) 9 kills all 9 lives is they way the hpunix guy explained it to me in the mid 90s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago This is put so beautifully! permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago This is put so beautifully! permalink fedilink source parent