▲ 30 ▼ Umm I think I'll just delete you instead (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by xaxl@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] joao@aussie.zone 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'd understand paying for an active feature, like to SEND voice messages, but not having to pay to restrict spam sent my way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gosling@lemmy.world 40 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) This is VOICE MESSAGE we're talking about, not calls nor chats. You can already block calls from non contacts and create a folder to only show chats from your contact. How many voice message spams have you received that you feel like this is a deal breaker and how is Signal an appropriate alternative in this regard, when it doesn't even have as many privacy options including this one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] deweydecibel@lemmy.world -12 points 3 years ago If it wasn't useful it wouldn't be paywalled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gosling@lemmy.world 40 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) This is VOICE MESSAGE we're talking about, not calls nor chats. You can already block calls from non contacts and create a folder to only show chats from your contact. How many voice message spams have you received that you feel like this is a deal breaker and how is Signal an appropriate alternative in this regard, when it doesn't even have as many privacy options including this one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] deweydecibel@lemmy.world -12 points 3 years ago If it wasn't useful it wouldn't be paywalled. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] deweydecibel@lemmy.world -12 points 3 years ago If it wasn't useful it wouldn't be paywalled. permalink fedilink source parent
