More than 50 people stood outside the Enoch Pratt Library’s Southeast Anchor branch on a recent spring morning in Baltimore. Parents with small children, teenagers, and senior citizens clustered outside the door and waited to hear their ticket numbers called.

They weren’t there for books—at least, not at that moment. They came to shop for groceries.

Connected to the library, the brightly painted market space is small but doesn’t feel cramped. Massive windows drench it in sunshine. In a previous life, it was a café. Now, shelves, tables, counters, and a refrigerator are spread out across the room, holding a mix of produce and shelf-stable goods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Put me in that position and I'd be paying for ads and shit to get the government to tax people like me more.

Why on earth would you do that when you could just skip the middle men and give the money directly to the poor? That seems a lot more efficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Philanthropy is ineffective, that's our current system and it's not working

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Weird, I could swear I'm paying taxes for social security, medicare, and food stamps, yet somehow, most of the money ends up in the military industrial complex.

    But I'm sure that if only the government had more tax revenue, they'd spend every extra dollar on welfare programs, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    If we stop electing conservatives yes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right, because Democrats are basically immune to corruption. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    At no point did I say Republicans

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Look buddy, if you’re going to be purposely ambiguous and evasive, I think I’m just going to end the discussion here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments